The FrankenPope Feud

The FrankenPope Feud

Interview with neo-Catholic and founder of Catholic Answers Karl Keating, whose new book is out on the arguments surrounding Pope Francis

 

Karl Keating, neo-Catholic and founder of Catholic Answers. Keating is the author of Catholicism and Fundamentalism and other books. He retired from Catholic Answers in 2017.

California Catholic Daily exclusive.

What prompted you to write The Francis Feud: Why and How Conservative Catholics Squabble about Pope Francis?

The ongoing feud prompted me.

Some conservatively-minded Catholics like everything Francis says and does. Others think he’s tearing the Church apart. Some say he’s a breath of fresh air. Others say he’s sowing confusion in the ranks. I was surprised and disappointed to find so many solid Catholics butting heads with one another.

The Francis Feud looks at the way these Catholics have been arguing about the pope. Call it a study in rhetoric or a critique of good and bad arguments (there have been plenty of the latter).

Why bring out such a book now?

Because in recent months three best-selling books have appeared criticizing Francis: Henry Sire’s The Dictator Pope, Phil Lawler’s Lost Shepherd, and Ross Douthat’s To Change the Church.

These books vary in tone, accuracy, and effect. Cumulatively, they have generated lots of controversy among Catholics, who now are taking sides, for and against the pope and each other.

The Francis Feud book cover

Where are you in all of this?

I’m no disinterested observer. I quote others at length. I also quote myself at length. Not only have I been privy to discussions, but I’ve been part of many of them. In this book I wear two hats: observer and participant.

I see no reason to affect an impartiality that I don’t have. If there has been a squabble concerning Pope Francis, I’ve played a role, if only as a secondary squabbler.

What’s the root issue here?

It’s when or whether to criticize a reigning pope. Is it ever—or never—proper? Might it be sometimes proper, even if not always proper? And is proper even the right word? The term suggests something right or permissible but not necessary or compelled.

Perhaps the question should be: when is it necessary to criticize a reigning pope? If there are necessary times, who should do the criticizing—high-level Churchmen, well-degreed academics, well-read laymen—maybe even the Catholic next door who has a gripe?

You quote many people (some of note) with whom you’ve been friends for years. What reactions have they had to The Francis Feud?

Let’s just say that I seem to have been dropped from some Christmas card lists.

—Karl Keating

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2018/08/27/the-frankenpope-feud/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

2 comments on “The FrankenPope Feud

  1. Creeps like Keating cause their damage, too. He’s one of those sheep herders: Obey your bishop, don’t criticize the pope, go through channels… Besides, you’re likely too stupid, unlike the educated KK, to know what you’re talking about, anyhow. Just voice your concerns to the diocese, then shut up and know your place.

    Servitium could provide a few choice words about KK, whom he had to ban from this forum after giving him a chance to discuss a topic honestly. I don’t recall the details.

  2. KK’s full o’ his guru’s favorite word: caca.
    He drew $250,000 annually when he ran CA and cashed in on the huge market of pewsitters who’d fall for anything, even Wojtylan gimmicks passed off as “real” Catholicism.

Leave a Reply