A Priest, Bishop or Cardinal Giving A Boy or Lad a Handjob Is a Species of Rape, and Anyone Who Argues Otherwise Should Be Suspected of Pederasty Himself

A Priest, Bishop or Cardinal Giving A Boy or Lad a Handjob Is a Species of Rape, and Anyone Who Argues Otherwise Should Be Suspected of Pederasty Himself

Posted on  by Ann Barnhardt

Multiple quick-hitters in this post.

***The odious Bill Donohue of the “Catholic League” charity-lobbying organization – a man who takes a $500,000 annual salary – some 15% of the total annual revenue – is actually now arguing that priests cornering and giving terrified 13 year old boys handjobs and blowjobs isn’t “rape” because only “penetration” counts as rape.  I’ll say what others won’t: Any man who would dare make this argument MUST be automatically suspected of being a sex pervert himself.  

***I’ll make a prediction in the hopes that it will be wrong, or might serve to derail a possibility.  I’d be willing to bet that Mary Ann Glendon is being lined up to have some sort of role in the USCCB’s “blue ribbon investigatory panel” farce that they are scrambling to put together.  Glendon is a Harvard Law School professor, was Ambassador to the Holy See at the end of the George W. Bush administration, is a dyed-in-the-wool Neo-Conservative, is a woman, and until just recently was sitting on the Vatican committee to investigate – wait for it – the Vatican Bank.  Here’s the WaybackMachine snapshot of the Vatican Bank’s “governance” page.  Note who the official “Prelate” is: yup.  Monsignor Battista Ricca.  As in the faggot that was shacked up in Montevideo, Uruguay with his Swiss Army sodomy partner, who would frequently cruise public parks for sodomy, and was caught in an elevator with a boy prostitute, and now runs not only the Vatican Bank, but also the Casa Santa Marta – the luxury hotel that Antipope Bergoglio lives in at the Vatican. Anyway, back to Mary Ann Glendon.  This is a woman who spent YEARS, side-by-side with her daughter’s priest baby-daddy, the priest father of her grandson, Fr. Thomas Williams, aggressively and ruthlessly CHARACTER ASSASSINATING PEOPLE WHO WERE DESPERATELY TRYING TO BLOW THE WHISTLE ON THE RAPIST MARCIAL MACIEL AND THE LEGION OF CHRIST RACKETEERING SEX CULT ORGANIZATION.

One more time, just to be sure it sinks in: Mary Ann Glendon spent YEARS in the late 1990s and 2000s going after and publicly character assassinating the molestation and rape victims of Marcial Maciel and the Legion of Christ along with with the Legion of Christ’s #3 priest and Maciel’s roommate Fr. Thomas Williams, who was openly sleeping with Glendon’s daughter, and was the father of Glendon’s grandson. Glendon, while she was trying to destroy the whistleblowers, mostly priests and seminarians, was also personally advising and vouching for the “sanctity” of Macial to Pope John Paul II himself.

If Cardinal Sean O’Malley hasn’t already recruited Mary Ann Glendon to sit on some bulls–t panel, I’d be VERY surprised. If and when Mary Ann Glendon is named to ANY such panel, all decent people of good will should go absolutely apes–t until Glendon is driven back under whatever rock she crawls out from under.

***Fr. Z has put forward the idea that these faggot clerics and prelates are POSSESSED.  This is 100% false.  They are NOT possessed.  They are demonically OPPRESSED, but not POSSESSED, and I am surprised and disappointed at Fr. Z for making such a claim, because I thought he knew better.  People that are POSSESSED are NOT CULPABLE for their actions, because a demon or demons has completely taken over their body.  The demon or demons are “behind the wheel” so to speak.  That is NOT what we are talking about here. We are talking about men who have freely chosen their actions. Period. These faggots – and all faggots and sex perverts of every stripe – FREELY CHOOSE the path of Diabolical Narcissism – that, is, the freely chosen self-purgation of charity (love) from the soul.  It is called “Diabolical” narcissism because that is exactly what satan and the demons freely chose to do when they rejected God and were cast into hell and forever shut out of heaven.  It is a FREE CHOICE to say, “I WILL NOT LOVE.”  From that free choice to not love proceeds all other personality disorders and especially sexual perversions.  All sex perverts are Diabolical Narcissists.  All sex perverts freely choose their wretchedness.  And that wretchedness is a downward spiral.  Heterosexual sin and perversions will lead to homosexual perversions, which will lead to adolescent and child rape perversions, which leads to incestuous perversions, etc.  Put another way, satan doesn’t possess these men because he doesn’t need to.  They are freely on-board with the satanic pogrom, yes, P-O-G-R-O-M, and thus fully, totally culpable.  Satan’s ultimate prize.

***Speaking of demons and demonic oppression… The most attractive sins to demons, sins that bring demons flocking to a person and then ATTACH those demons to a person are: #1 participation in satanic rituals, and #2 sacrilegious fornication/sodomy.  As in priests having sex and/or sodomy with concubines or either sex or with child and teen victims. People who engage in these vile crimes, including laypeople – both men (there are plenty of laymen faggots in Rome whose raison d’etre isn’t giving boilerplate tours of the Vatican Museums and St. Peter’s Basilica.  They are there for the Vatican Bathhouse), and women, “Chalice-snatchers” like the repulsive Liz Lev, who chase priests as combination trophies and blackmail packages.  It is DANGEROUS to be in close physical proximity to such people given the massive throngs of demons that attach themselves to such vile souls. Sadly, what this means is that some of the most spiritually toxic spaces on earth today are Novus Ordo seminaries, chanceries, and inside the Vatican itself, and the city of Rome generally.

***Which leads to another erroneous statement by Fr. Z, who, again, should know better.  He said recently that sodomy wasn’t much of a problem in seminaries anymore, and really isn’t anything to worry about these days.  WRONG. WRONG. WRONG.  The Trad seminaries have cleaned up a lot in the last 15 years, but even then, a young man CAN NOT go into seminary, even Trad seminary, wearing rose-colored glasses.  I can not, in good conscience, recommend that any young man enter a Novus Ordo seminary.  To me, this is just obvious. Not only are the faggots still completely entrenched, if not in the rectory of the seminary, then definitely in the diocesan chancery, but the veil is being lifted on the Novus Ordo as being conceived in malice by Freemasonic-Communist-Sodomite infiltrators to destroy the Church from the inside out.  WHY would anyone in their right minds sign up for THAT?  The Novus Ordo has no future.  The future is the august and venerable Rite of Pius V.

We all want progress, but if you’re on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive.
-C.S. Lewis

***And while I’m on Fr. Z, I’d like to publicly call him out on his advice given through his blog for well over a decade now, that guys in the Novus Ordo seminaries should “keep your heads down, and just get ordained”.  You know what? That steaming pile of horses–t is EXACTLY why we are in this mess right now.  SILENCE.  Looking the other way.  Refusing to speak up for fear of some unpleasant consequence.  Being averse to any good or virtuous action that might result in unpleasantness of any kind has a name: EFFEMINACY.  Virtues, like virility and potency, are HABITS that must be developed.  Likewise, VICES, such as effeminacy, are habitual, and if a young man begins engaging in EFFEMINACY while he is in the seminary and NOT calling out sodomitical activity, much less heresy, that habit will take root and grow.  Because there will ALWAYS be an excuse.  “Well, I can’t say anything because….”

QUAERITUR: Where are all of the priests that Fr. Z and others specifically told to “keep their heads down and just get ordained”, now?  Where in the hell have they been?  HIDING.  COWERING.  Too terrified of crossing their filthy faggot bishops to say even one word about the fact that faggots had taken over the Church and the seminaries.  No, it took a liberal Jew attorney/politician in Pennsylvania to finally speak up about this.  WHAT DOES THAT SAY? So, that whole “keep your head down” plan didn’t work so well, as anyone whole had ever studied moral theology, or just used common sense, could have told you.  Effeminacy only breeds more effeminacy – it never yields virility.

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2018/08/20/a-priest-bishop-or-cardinal-giving-a-boy-or-lad-a-handjob-is-a-species-of-rape-and-anyone-who-argues-otherwise-should-be-suspected-of-pederasty-himself/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

3 comments on “A Priest, Bishop or Cardinal Giving A Boy or Lad a Handjob Is a Species of Rape, and Anyone Who Argues Otherwise Should Be Suspected of Pederasty Himself

  1. She said it all ! Totally agree 👍 👍👍👍🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  2. Regarding commission appointments, it is likely there will be more than one Opus Dei initiate from Harvard Law (with his or her head) in the sand appointed to misdirect the investigation from too much scrutiny on the JP2 years. It is also likely that the flamboyant Father Martin will be appointed as the official LGBT rights spokesmen on the commission to misdirect things away from homosexualism.

    Anyone who helped cover for Maciel and the abuses in the Legion should be banned from playing ANY role in this, but with “Who am I to judge?” Bergoglio in charge, don’t count on it.

    The Church is in for a rough ride with what will likely be the most surrealist public Rorschach test on sex in history.

    As for the bishop of Newark, N.J. who reportedly never heard anything about a “gay subculture” in his diocese [hint]: when they dress up in leather like The Village People and cruise gay bars, nightclubs, and bath houses on weekends looking for men to have sex with, it’s a gay subculture.

  3. It gets silly and absurd to have to point these things out BUT…when this is supposedly over, there will have to be an investigation of the investigation and of the commission and of the organizations and networks behind the commission members.

    Fasten your seatbelts…

    Suffice it to say, there will no trads or real conservative Catholics on any such commission. Much effort will be given to directing the investigation AWAY from the modernist heresy and the infiltration of the Catholic Church by homosexuals, heretics, and anti-Catholic forces.

    There has been a lot of rage unleashed, much of it justifiable. But mobs can go off the radar. It is by no means assured that having a freemason Attorney General launch RICO investigations will be spotless, harmless, or benevolent. This is a climax for anti-Catholic secret societies in their efforts to destroy the Church. Why so much enthusiasm for this while Juanita Broaddrick sits at home in Arkansas WITHOUT justice or any investigation of her rape?

Leave a Reply