When a pope politicizes doctrine, he betrays the teaching of Christ and His Church

When a pope politicizes doctrine, he betrays the teaching of Christ and His Church

August 17, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – David Warren has written an excellent piece at The Catholic Thing on “Deathgate,” as Fr John Hunwicke names the latest scandal emanating from the halls of the Vatican—namely, Pope Francis’s attempt to change the teaching of divine revelation and the ordinary universal magisterium of the Church on the moral legitimacy and therefore admissibility in principle of capital punishment, whatever the prudential limitations on its use might be in this or that contingent set of circumstances. Warren writes:

The damage that is done, and will be done, by this latest breach of “papal etiquette,” is broader and will be broader than first appears. Beyond the creation of a precedent for altering Church teaching by papal fiat, it confirms the politicization of our doctrine. Henceforth, and for the foreseeable future, the Holy See (even after Bergoglio’s demise) is re-oriented to social and political issues. … [T]he rewrite of paragraph 2267 of the Catechism brings into scandal all the previous social doctrine of the Church. … Now we accept the alteration of the teaching itself, because it is not in accord with “the times.”

What makes the teaching of Jesus Christ rise above all centuries and all cultures, Warren continues, is that we find in His words a timeless wisdom equally applicable to the ever-varying situations of temporal life. Christ did not come to earth to abolish the death penalty; he calmly stated Pilate’s sin in putting an innocent man to death with the genuine power he had been given “from above,” even as Christ willed that He should suffer His Passion between two malefactors who knew they had been put to death for good reason. Although St. Paul converted after recognizing his guilt in persecuting the Mystical Body of Christ, he never failed to teach reverence for civil authority, which does not hold the sword in vain, but uses it to punish evildoers. Fathers and Doctors, Popes and Councils form an unbroken consensus of two millennia in favor of the inherent legitimacy of capital punishment, even when individuals among them were strongly opposed to its use in practice.

Warren then says:

The wisdom of restricting ourselves to Christian inspiration—to what can be apprehended in Scripture and Tradition from our beginnings—was previously understood. Perhaps the greatest (and most monstrous) achievement of modernity was to unhinge this.

Modernity has put asunder what God has joined together: the sources of divine revelation and the actual exercise of Christian teaching in the form of catechesis, mystagogy, homiletics, theology, and liturgy. All forms of teaching should never depart from “what can be apprehended in Scripture and Tradition from our beginnings,” and the single greatest error, the characteristic error of modern times, is to allow ourselves to drift further and further from these givens, until we reach a point where, with towering hubris or daft naivete, we start teaching something different, at cross-purposes, and finally, contradictory.

In this way a preacher, be he an ordinary priest, a bishop, or even the pope, becomes like a man sawing off the branch on which he is sitting. For a pope to politicize our doctrine, yoking it to modern secular Western liberalism, while deliberately surrounding it with clouds of confusion—“Is it a doctrinal change? Is it only a prudential judgment? Is it a new category? Catholic rabbis, get ready to write your endless commentaries!”—is to betray the luminously supernatural character of Christ’s teachings and the Catholic tradition that emerged organically from them.

David Warren is right: the pope’s re-writing of the Catechism has established a baleful precedent. But so too have Amoris Laetitia, and Evangelii Gaudium, and Vultum Dei, and many other acts of this pontificate. The pope continues to destabilize the doctrinal and sacramental integrity of the Roman Catholic Church. It is high time that the faithful stopped making excuses for him simply because he happens to be pope. It is precisely because he is pope that his heterodoxy is inexcusable. Now, more than ever, Christ’s faithful must know the Catholic religion well, relying on approved traditional sources which concur with one another over the span of many centuries; they must speak clearly and without compromise; and above all, they must pray for the pope and the entire hierarchy, that they may bring the unadulterated message of divine revelation to the modern world.

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2018/08/17/when-a-pope-politicizes-doctrine-he-betrays-the-teaching-of-christ-and-his-church/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

2 comments on “When a pope politicizes doctrine, he betrays the teaching of Christ and His Church

  1. Yes. Doing just that, however, will require a number of divine favors.
    /
    Attempts to quantify the various elements involved is, alone, seriously daunting. That tradition now matters, optimistically estimated, to not even 4% of the Catholic Church en masse, if one includes clerics and scholars simply not adamantly opposed to it outright, gives little reason to expect a renaissance of traditional doctrine or praxis. Even the genuinely best and brightest clerics who have known only a Modernist-governed formation and Church career are either forced into doing their own self-taught research on their own time or they are merely going on instinct without a truly systematic comprehension of all that is entailed. The laity situation is even more grim.
    /
    It may be accurate to state that, barring the sudden appearance of a pope truly raised up by God alone, traditionalism, per se, could easily end up finding its voice no sooner than in the very distant future.

  2. Yes. Doing just that, however, will require a number of divine favors.
    /
    Attempts to quantify the various elements involved is, alone, seriously daunting. That tradition now matters, optimistically estimated, to not even 4% of the Catholic Church en masse, if one includes clerics and scholars simply not adamantly opposed to it outright, gives little reason to expect a renaissance of traditional doctrine or praxis. Even the genuinely best and brightest clerics who have known only a Modernist-governed formation and Church career are either forced into doing their own self-taught research on their own time or they are merely going on instinct without a truly systematic comprehension of all that is entailed. The laity situation is even more grim.
    /
    It may be accurate to state that, barring the sudden appearance of a pope truly raised up by God alone, traditionalism, per se, could easily end up finding its voice no sooner than in the very distant future.

Leave a Reply