CATHOLIC MAKE-UP OF THE SUPREME COURT

CATHOLIC MAKE-UP OF THE SUPREME COURT

by David Nussman  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  July 2, 2018    

Most of today’s Supreme Court justices are either professed Catholics, nominal Catholics or fallen-away Catholics

WASHINGTON (ChurchMilitant.com) – In the past few decades, Catholic judges have constituted a large part of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Of the 12 justices who were Catholic while serving on the Court, six have been appointed since 1985. Of those, five are still on the Court today.

In years past, leftist commentators specifically complained about the Court’s Catholic composition, calling it an obstacle to the abortion agenda and the gay agenda. An op-ed in 2009, for instance, called the Supreme Court a “Catholic boys’ club.”

That piece, penned by the late Frances Kissling — who headed the condemned abortion advocacy group Catholics for Choice — lamented the fact that Catholics on the Supreme Court tend to lean conservative. “I am freaked out that [then-President Barack Obama] may nominate a Catholic to the Supreme Court,” she said.

The incumbent Supreme Court justices who call themselves Catholic are Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor and Chief Justice John Roberts. A sixth, Justice Neil Gorsuch, was raised Catholic but currently attends Episcopalian services. The remaining three justices are Jewish.

Kennedy, appointed by Reagan, recently announced his resignation. He’s a nominal Catholic who supports same-sex “marriage” and so-called abortion rights. Kennedy angered pro-lifers when he voted in 1992 to uphold Roe v. Wade. Kennedy and Sotomayor, both nominal Catholics, helped legalize same-sex “marriage” in 2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges. The other four Catholic justices serving at the time — including now-deceased Antonin Scalia — formed the minority in the 5–4 ruling.

With Kennedy’s resignation taking effect July 31, pro-abortion activists are worried about the future of abortion in the United States — especially since President Donald Trump campaigned on the promise to appoint pro-lifers to the Supreme Court.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warned fellow Democrats about Trump’s nominees, writing in The New York Times, “Perhaps the most consequential issues at stake in this Supreme Court vacancy are affordable health care and a woman’s freedom to make the most sensitive medical decisions about her body.”

Schumer continued, “If you do not want a Supreme Court Justice who will overturn Roe v. Wade and undo the Affordable Care Act, tell your senators they should not vote for a candidate from Mr. Trump’s preordained list.”

An opinion piece in the Los Angeles Times warned that Kennedy’s resignation could mean “decades of legal diktats rooted in the religious rigidity and social Darwinism of the court’s right wing.”

 

Right now, Trump has an official list of 25 potential nominees to take Kennedy’s spot in the Supreme Court. At least seven of them attended Catholic institutions for high school, college or law school.

Margaret A. Ryan and Amy Coney Barrett went to Notre Dame Law School, the latter working there as a law professor. Federico Moreno and Thomas Hardiman obtained bachelor’s degrees at Notre Dame. Diane Sykes has her law degree from Marquette University Law School. Raymond Gruender and Brett Kavanaugh both graduated from Catholic high schools.

Sykes, who went to Jesuit-run Marquette, has ruled against pro-lifers on several occasions. A leftist columnist for Rewire.News noted, “While a judge in Wisconsin, Sykes sentenced two anti-choice protesters to 60 days in jail for a clinic protest. Then, once on the federal bench, Sykes wrote the majority opinion striking down an Indiana law that attempted to defund Planned Parenthood.”

At least two of the seven — Barrett and Kavanaugh — are widely known as Catholics.

Barrett, though grilled for being Catholic during Senate hearings last year, has written that judges should remove themselves from cases where their personal beliefs might prevent them from giving an unbiased ruling.

Kavanaugh, meanwhile, has no track record on life and marriage issues, his court decisions focusing primarily on federal administrative law matters.

But they are not the only Catholics on Trump’s list. Moreno, for instance, was involved in the Catholic Lawyers Guild — panned by some on the grounds of the separation of Church and State.

Though not Catholic-educated, Judge William Pryor, Jr. of Alabama — also on Trump’s list — was raised Catholic and has a staunchly pro-life and pro-marriage track record.

The first Catholic to serve on the Court was Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, appointed by President Andrew Jackson in 1836. Taney has a negative legacy for delivering a pro-slavery ruling in 1857’s Dred Scott v. Sandford — considered one of the worst rulings in the history of the Supreme Court. The decision heightened political tensions that would soon erupt in the U.S. Civil War.

During the 20th century, it became common custom to have one Catholic — or at least a justice sympathetic to Catholicism— serve on the Court. It was known colloquially as “the Catholic seat.”

The period between the retirement of pro-abortion John Paul Stevens in 2010 and Gorsuch’s appointment in 2017 marked the first time in American history that the Court had no Protestants serving as justices.

All nine current justices completed law degree programs at Ivy League universities: five at Harvard, three at Yale and one at Columbia.

Six of them obtained their undergraduate degrees from Ivy League institutions, and two others attended Stanford University. Only one justice, devout Catholic Clarence Thomas, went to a Catholic institution for his undergraduate degree.

 

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2018/07/02/catholic-make-up-of-the-supreme-court/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

One comment on “CATHOLIC MAKE-UP OF THE SUPREME COURT

  1. Quote: “An opinion piece in the Los Angeles Times warned that Kennedy’s resignation could mean “decades of legal diktats rooted in the religious rigidity and social Darwinism of the court’s right wing.”

    Ironic? Most of the time it is liberals who are calling for Darwinism to be imposed by the Supreme Court. The secular humanists and Malthusians promoting population control derive their support for abortion from Darwin and eugenics. Sounds like they are a bit confused. Liberal retards can never get their story straight.

    Gee, if Darwinism is bad in its social Darwinist version, you guys have a big problem. It’s your ideology, stupid.

Leave a Reply