If You Say ‘I Feel’ Rather Than ‘I Think,’ You Must Cluck Like A Chicken

If You Say ‘I Feel’ Rather Than ‘I Think,’ You Must Cluck Like A Chicken

Law Professor To Students: If You Say ‘I Feel’ Rather Than ‘I Think,’ You Must Cluck Like A Chicken

A professor of law at Faulkner University in Montgomery, Alabama, has had enough of millennial students who rely on trendy terms so they can deride the wisdom of the ages. Adam MacLeod, associate professor of law at Jones School of Law, wrote an article for The New Boston Post in which he published a speech that warned his first-year law students he would not accept any words ending in “ism.”

MacLeod’s preamble to his speech stated, “For several years now my students have been mostly Millennials. Contrary to stereotype, I have found that the vast majority of them want to learn. But true to stereotype, I increasingly find that most of them cannot think, don’t know very much, and are enslaved to their appetites and feelings. Their minds are held hostage in a prison fashioned by elite culture and their undergraduate professors. They cannot learn until their minds are freed from that prison.”

Then, the terrific speech. It commenced like this:

Before I can teach you how to reason, I must first teach you how to rid yourself of unreason. For many of you have not yet been educated. You have been dis-educated. To put it bluntly, you have been indoctrinated. Before you learn how to think you must first learn how to stop unthinking. Reasoning requires you to understand truth claims, even truth claims that you think are false or bad or just icky. Most of you have been taught to label things with various “isms” which prevent you from understanding claims you find uncomfortable or difficult. Reasoning requires correct judgment. Judgment involves making distinctions, discriminating. Most of you have been taught how to avoid critical, evaluative judgments by appealing to simplistic terms such as “diversity” and “equality.”

MacLeod continued:

Reasoning requires you to understand the difference between true and false. And reasoning requires coherence and logic. Most of you have been taught to embrace incoherence and illogic. You have learned to associate truth with your subjective feelings, which are neither true nor false but only yours, and which are constantly changeful.

Noting that the students had “weeds” in their minds, MacLeod asserted:

Each of you has different weeds, and so we will need to take this on the case-by-case basis. But there are a few weeds that infect nearly all of your brains. So I am going to pull them out now.

First, except when describing an ideology, you are not to use a word that ends in “ism.” Communism, socialism, Nazism, and capitalism are established concepts in history and the social sciences, and those terms can often be used fruitfully to gain knowledge and promote understanding. “Classism,” “sexism,” “materialism,” “cisgenderism,” and (yes) even racism are generally not used as meaningful or productive terms, at least as you have been taught to use them. Most of the time, they do not promote understanding.

MacLeod succinctly stated, “In fact, ‘isms’ prevent you from learning.”

MacLeod tore into the idea of what he called “ chronological snobbery,” the idea that “moral knowledge progresses inevitably, such that later generations are morally and intellectually superior to earlier generations, and that the older the source the more morally suspect that source is.”

MacLeod ripped into the importance placed by students on diversity and equality, pointing out, “Some diversity is bad. For example, if slavery is inherently wrong, as I suspect we all think it is, then a diversity of views about the morality of slavery is worse than complete agreement that slavery is wrong. Similarly, equality is not to be desired for its own sake. Nobody is equal in all respects. We are all different, which is to say that we are all not the same, which is to say that we are unequal in many ways.”

Then, the crux of the matter: “You should not bother to tell us how you feel about a topic. Tell us what you think about it. If you can’t think yet, that’s O.K.. Tell us what Aristotle thinks, or Hammurabi thinks, or H.L.A. Hart thinks. Borrow opinions from those whose opinions are worth considering.”

Macleod concluded:

1. The only “ism” I ever want to come out your mouth is a syllogism. If I catch you using an “ism” or its analogous “ist” — racist, classist, etc. — then you will not be permitted to continue speaking until you have first identified which “ism” you are guilty of at that very moment. You are not allowed to fault others for being biased or privileged until you have first identified and examined your own biases and privileges.

2. If I catch you this semester using the words “fair,” “diversity,” or “equality,” or a variation on those terms, and you do not stop immediately to explain what you mean, you will lose your privilege to express any further opinions in class until you first demonstrate that you understand three things about the view that you are criticizing.

3. If you ever begin a statement with the words “I feel,” before continuing you must cluck like a chicken or make some other suitable animal sound.

Get AQ Email Updates

4 comments on “If You Say ‘I Feel’ Rather Than ‘I Think,’ You Must Cluck Like A Chicken

  1. Great stuff, albeit chancy at best to exclude Modernism as one of the “prohibited” terms. It is, after all, the mundane, as well as THE spiritual, reason we even have millennials being accepted into law schools in this woeful era of ubiquitous dumb bunnyism. :-)
    I got to meet several law school students over the course of the past several years. Bright as new pennies, obviously. But suffering from exactly what the good professor spoke to.
    I expect the same blight has been infecting medical schools as well; an entirely chilling thought when considered alongside the collapse of moral standards in the profession wrought by the powerful euthanasia and body part trafficking lobbies.
    (“Live by the dumb, die by the dumb.” Tom Clancy (RIP)

  2. PS: All may not quite yet be lost, however. I believe medical and law students still live in mortal terror of the wrath and seeming omniscience of their professors.
    A few more advocates of Macleodism in high positions and the blood running in the gilded streets of two of our nations most hallowed professions might yet be staunched.

  3. Reminds me of this scene from The Paper Chase:


  4. One of the very few classic movie moments from recent decades.

Leave a Reply