Four Cardinals release letter asking to meet Pope about ‘confusion and disorientation’ in Church

BREAKING: Four Cardinals release letter asking to meet Pope about ‘confusion and disorientation’ in Church

[This reminds me of … “The cardinals keep asking the pope to answer their dubia,/la de da de de, la de da de da./And threatening him with some sort of formal correction,/la de da de de, la de da de da.”]

Pete Baklinski

ROME, June 20, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — Four Cardinals have publicly released their letter to the Pope from April 25, 2017 unsuccessfully asking him for a private audience to discuss “confusion and disorientation” within the Church after the publication of the Pope’s April 2016 Exhortation Amoris Laetitia.

In the letter Cardinals lament the great division in the Church on basic morality as a result of the pope’s exhortation.

“And so it is happening — how painful it is to see this! — that what is sin in Poland is good in Germany, that what is prohibited in the archdiocese of Philadelphia is permitted in Malta,” they wrote.

The Cardinals asked the Holy Father if during the audience he might answer their five original questions from last year regarding whether or not Amoris Laetitia conforms to perennial Catholic teaching. They also asked the Pope if they could discuss with him the “situation of confusion and disorientation” in the Church caused by “objectively ambiguous passages” in the Exhortation.

The letter was written by Cardinal Carlo Caffarra on behalf of Cardinals Walter Brandmüller, Raymond Burke, and Joachim Meisner.

The Cardinals begin their letter to the Pope by renewing their “absolute dedication and our unconditional love for the Chair of Peter and for Your august person, in whom we recognize the Successor of Peter and the Vicar of Jesus: the ‘sweet Christ on earth.’”

The Cardinals then state that it is the “awareness of the grave responsibility” of their office as “advisers of the Successor of Peter in his sovereign ministry” that moved them to ask the Pope for a meeting.

They wrote that they were still hoping that the Pope would “resolve uncertainties and to bring clarity on some points” of Amoris Laetitia as outlined in the dubia they delivered to the Pope and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith last September.

The Cardinals went public with their “dubia” in November after the Pope failed to give them a response. They had hoped that the Pope answering their five yes-or-no questions would dispel what they called the “uncertainty, confusion, and disorientation among many of the faithful” stemming from the controversial exhortation.

The five yes-or-no questions they asked were: 1) whether adulterers can receive Holy Communion; 2) whether there are absolute moral norms that must be followed “without exceptions”; 3) whether habitual adultery can be an “objective situation of grave habitual sin”; 4) whether an intrinsically evil act can be turned into a “‘subjectively’ good” act based on “circumstances or intentions”; and 5) whether one can act contrary to known “absolute moral norms that prohibit intrinsically evil acts” based on “conscience.”

“Not having received any response from Your Holiness, we have reached the decision to ask You, respectfully and humbly, for an Audience, together if Your Holiness would like,” the Cardinals wrote in their April 25 letter.

The Cardinals state that since Amoris Laetitia’s release a year ago, “interpretations of some objectively ambiguous passages…have publicly been given that are not divergent from but contrary to the permanent Magisterium of the Church.”

“Despite the fact that the Prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith has repeatedly declared that the doctrine of the Church has not changed, numerous statements have appeared from individual Bishops, Cardinals, and even Episcopal Conferences, approving what the Magisterium of the Church has never approved,” the letter states.

“Not only access to the Holy Eucharist for those who objectively and publicly live in a situation of grave sin, and intend to remain in it, but also a conception of moral conscience contrary to the Tradition of the Church,” it adds.

Indeed, earlier this month Argentinian Bishop Angel José Macin of the diocese of Reconquista celebrated a special Mass for civilly-divorced-and-remarried couples currently living in adultery in which they were all invited to receive Holy Communion.

The exhortation has been used by various bishops and bishops’ groups, including those in Argentina, Malta, Germany, and Belgium, to issue pastoral guidelines that allow Communion to be given to civilly-divorced-and-remarried Catholics living in adultery. But bishops in Canada and Poland have issued statements based on their reading of the same document that forbids such couples to receive Communion.

States the Cardinal’s letter: “And so it is happening — how painful it is to see this! — that what is sin in Poland is good in Germany, that what is prohibited in the archdiocese of Philadelphia is permitted in Malta. And so on. One is reminded of the bitter observation of B. Pascal: ‘Justice on this side of the Pyrenees, injustice on the other; justice on the left bank of the river, injustice on the right bank.’”

“Faced with this grave situation, in which many Christian communities are being divided, we feel the weight of our responsibility, and our conscience impels us to ask humbly and respectfully for an Audience,” the letter concludes.

Cardinal Burke has stated that if Pope Francis refuses to clarify the ambiguities in the exhortation, then the cardinals would issue a “formal correction” of the document.

“There is, in the Tradition of the Church, the practice of correction of the Roman Pontiff. It is something that is clearly quite rare. But if there is no response to these questions, then I would say that it would be a question of taking a formal act of correction of a serious error,” said Burke in a November 2016 interview.

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2017/06/19/four-cardinals-release-letter-asking-to-meet-pope-about-confusion-and-disorientation-in-church/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

2 comments on “Four Cardinals release letter asking to meet Pope about ‘confusion and disorientation’ in Church

  1. “The Cardinals begin their letter to the Pope by renewing their “absolute dedication and our unconditional love for the Chair of Peter and for Your august person”

    Your Eminences, please shove your ‘unconditional love’. It is disturbing to see some of the most “conservative” cardinals of the Church using this incredibly stupid and blasphemous Liberal meme.

    THINK about what you are saying. If I must love someone ‘unconditionally’, that means I must love him no matter what he is or what he does.
    Do you love Satan?
    If I must love someone ‘unconditionally’, that means I must love him in preference to all other things.
    Do you love the pope more than God? More than the Church, and everyone in it?
    If I must love someone ‘unconditionally’, that means I must love him regardless of the consequences.
    Would you be willing to sacrifice the entire universe on the altar of your ‘unconditional love’ of Francis?

    Here’s a little basic Catholic philosophy for you.
    Love = to seek the good.
    There is already a condition in that definition…you can’t love something unless it is good.

    Now, a thing can be good not in act but merely in potency, but a thing has to be at least potentially good in order to be loved at all. Hence the real meaning of the old dictum “Love the sinner, hate the sin”. It is not that sinners, as sinners, are still lovable. They aren’t good, so they aren’t lovable. But they are potentially good; it is possible they will convert, and actually become good. So sinners are actually hateable, and potentially lovable; good people are actually lovable, and potentially hateable.
    The damned in hell are not lovable, and not even potentially, since their fate is fixed for eternity.

    So, love the office of the pope, yes. That in itself is good, and will always be so. But don’t love it unconditionally. The office exists on condition that it serves God.
    So, love the pope, yes. But love him for what he could and should be. What he actually is — an objectively blatant anti-Christ — must be hated. And we must battle against him with every means at our disposal.
    We should be striving to convert him from his actual hateable self into a good and lovable Christian. Lest he be found one day among Judas, and all others who are or will be hated for the rest of eternity.
    If you truly love the pope, you will love him NOT unconditionally, for if you love him unconditionally it won’t *matter* to you that he is an anti-Christ; you will do nothing to “resist him to the face” and thus open his eyes to his errors; you will do nothing to save him from hell.
    Unconditional love is always a false love.

    • The “Dubia Brothers” are still conciliarists. That’s why they are, so far, batting .000 whenever they step up to the plate.

      Using classical Roman politesse is admirable in formal correspondence with superiors.

      But, as our friend, NIN, makes clear, its admirability fades when it becomes maudlin.

Leave a Reply