THE SOROS FACTOR: Did O’Reilly Pick on the Wrong Guy?

THE SOROS FACTOR: Did O’Reilly Pick on the Wrong Guy?

Written by Remnant Staff Writer

To paraphrase the Bard, sexual harassment is a grievous fault and, if it’s true, grievously hath Bill O’Reilly answer’d it. But is that really what’s behind the fall of the FOX NEWS mogul? Or does it have more to do with the fact the O’Reilly thought he was big enough to expose New World Order front man, George Soros?

You don’t have to be a big fan of Bill O’Reilly’s to smell a rat here.
What’s really going on at FOX, and who’s next?

Get AQ Email Updates

5 comments on “THE SOROS FACTOR: Did O’Reilly Pick on the Wrong Guy?

  1. WashPost Reveals the Left’s Goal: The ‘Mission Was to Bring Down Bill O’Reilly’

    By Tim Graham | April 22, 2017

    The front page of Saturday’s Washington Post told the tale about the war on Fox News. It wasn’t about accusers getting a payout. It was about damaging the network by taking down its top star. The Post headline was “’Mission was to bring down Bill O’Reilly’.”

    The Post betrayed the liberal media’s contempt for the channel and its role in American politics. Reporters Manuel Roig-Franzia and Ben Terris called Fox “a lucrative channel that has played an outsize role in shaping the U.S. political landscape over the past two decades.”

    Who decides its influence is “outsize”? Can we detect some media jealousy as the Republicans control the White House and Congress? It’s “outsize” because liberals are on the outside?

    The wackiest part of the story that was on the front page came from leftist lawyer Lisa Bloom, the daughter of Gloria Allred and a former legal analyst for NBC News, who shamed a black accuser of O’Reilly into public appearances by comparing O’Reilly to the segregationists in Montgomery, Alabama that forced blacks to sit on the back of the bus:

    “Do you think Rosa Parks decided she was not going to do what she needed to do because people were going to say nasty things to her?” Bloom said, citing the heroine of the Montgomery bus boycott. “This is your time.”

    She also explained to her client in stark terms what she hoped to accomplish: “The mission was to bring down Bill O’Reilly.”

    Now that liberal lawyers have tasted victory, the war continues, from Bloom and from lawyer Nancy Erika Smith:

    Smith says it is hard for her to imagine a major culture shift at Fox; many key executives she described as “enablers” of Ailes and others remain in top executive positions. A former staffer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, agreed: “Ailes and O’Reilly might be gone, but the rest of the power structure is unchanged.”

    …The scandal took a toll inside the news organization.

    “There were a lot of mid-level staffers, especially women and minorities, who were — are — seriously considering leaving Fox,” a Fox News staffer said on Thursday as the newsroom was still absorbing O’Reilly’s departure.

  2. Bringing down BOR was a project of Media Matters, Obama’s orchestrator of media narratives. This is the core of the Left’s political action, propaganda central.

    “So many advertisers are not just removing their ads, but giving comments that they typically avoid, or would avoid. I mean, they’re making value judgments,” says Angelo Carusone, president of liberal watchdog organization Media Matters for America. That Carusone was caught off guard shows how unexpected the reaction was, as he’s long been planning for such a day. “I had the @StopOReilly [Twitter] account for seven years, and I just sat on it,” he says.

    The justification for these tactics against O’Reilly was that it was conduct at issue, not politics:
    …But of course, for Carusone and Media Matters, it was all about politics, and part of a plan hatched years ago, as we wrote about in 2011, Media Matters Plans “Guerrilla Warfare and Sabotage” on Fox News And Conservative Websites.

    [Cyprian:] I couldn’t stand to watch BOR, but this political warfare doesn’t bode well for what we may see on Fox in the future. TV news has been full of lies and misrepresentations from the beginning. Video editing presents such a temptation because it’s so easy to frame your report according to any predetermined perspective (60 Minutes, anyone?) My grandma used to say, “Don’t believe anything you hear, and only half of what you see.” Ah, to be back in the days when you could believe even a tenth of what you see!

  3. While a plot that was merely political on a mundane level due to Trump being granted interviews on The O’Reilly Factor, and what the globalists have lost with a Trump victory, seems plausible, there are other possibilities.

    Why did it happen now in the third week of April? The allegations and accusations have been around for a while. It appears to be an occult ritual for mind control known as the Killing of the King Ritual (in this case, the King of Cable News). The Old King (O’Reilly) is replaced by the New (young) King (Tucker Carlson).

    Since occultists had targeted Trump (and his supporters with a ritual hexing curse) this is not surprising. There had been confirmation that sorcerers and other occultists were supporting Trump’s opponent in the election with hideous occult rituals (this was revealed in emails released by WikiLeaks).

    It is also an occult fertility rite ritual preceding May Eve in the pagan Celtic calendar(Beltane, the Celtic spring festival):

    They are having a Beltane ritual bonfire to burn away the old Fox News and to usher in the new, younger, progressive version. The target was obviously chosen when it was revealed by PBS that O’Reilly’s ancestry traced back to King Niall of the Nine Hostages and the O’Reilly Kings of Breifne in medieval Ireland who triumphed at the Battle of 1256 A.D. for control of East Breifne, County Cavan, Ireland.

    Cloughoughter Castle captured & completed by the O’Reillys in 1233 A.D. (County Cavan, Ireland)

  4. The nuke attacks on ALL things “conservative” includes the proctology specimens with big paychecks and their drooling minions, trolling away on the internet.

    Frankly, it IS a serious issue, BOR’s totally unserious consideration aside.

    If you haven’t yet, read Pat Buchanan’s interview by a Politico appratchik (who actually did a fairly decent job) on why it’s likely, but not inevitably, already too late.

    See you in the caves, guys.

  5. Hannity and Rush Limbaugh will be next. The WikiLeaks emails also revealed that Michael Savage was targeted by the Hillaryoids. The original plan was for Hillary to win the election and have the FCC go after conservative media personalities much in the way that Youtube and Twitter have censored conservative sources. The pseudo-legal grounds would have been that anyone who opposes same-sex marriage, open borders, global warming ideology, and New World Order globalist socialism, is guilty of “hate speech”. The plan to marginalize conservative Christians, including traditional Catholics, is ongoing. The election of Trump slowed it down, at least in terms of the federal government, but this won’t end just with O’Reilly. It is part of the same attack strategy that took down General Michael Flynn.

    Don’t forget the “Catholic Spring” conspiracy. The idea for that came from a discussion on Catholic ecclesiastical politics in an interview Art Bell did with Malachi Martin in 1998. Why were American liberals listening so intently to Malachi Martin discuss Luciferian and Illuminati infiltration of the Vatican? They were still obsessed about what to do with the Catholic Church in the WikiLeaks emails.

Leave a Reply