Conservative opposition to Pope Francis spurs talk of a schism

Conservative opposition to Pope Francis spurs talk of a schism

Of all the recent attacks launched by conservatives against Pope Francis, one stood out more than most.

It came from a German cardinal who is one of the most powerful men in the Vatican. And it underlined a growing backlash in the church to some of Francis’ more progressive ideas — a backlash led largely by German and American bishops who fear the pope may be overturning centuries of doctrine on divorce, among other matters.

The cardinal, Gerhard Mueller, the pope’s own doctrinal chief, made it clear in an interview in February that he firmly opposed Francis’ tinkering with the church’s ban on divorced and civilly remarried Catholics taking Communion.
Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Mueller, prefect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, opposes s
Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Mueller, prefect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, opposes some of Pope Francis’ views. (Alessandra Tarantino / Associated Press)

Francis has implied that the ban could be relaxed. But Mueller told Il Timone, an Italian Catholic publication: “No power in heaven or on earth, neither an angel, nor the pope, nor a council, nor a law of the bishops, has the faculty to change it.”
Paid Post
What’s This?
Best Steakhouse in Every State

A Message from The Daily Meal

The U.S. has great steakhouses from sea to shining sea, and we’re presenting the 51 best. Did your favorite make the cut?
See More

As Francis enters his fourth year in office, his conservative opponents have chosen to stand and fight over his 2016 apostolic exhortation titled “Amoris Laetitia,” or “The Joy of Love,” in which he suggested bishops can use discretion in granting Communion to Catholics who divorce, then remarry in a civil ceremony.

Francis’ guidance was seen by many as contradicting the ruling, which dates to the early days of the Roman Catholic Church, that couples are living in sin if they remarry, because their first marriage is still valid in the eyes of the church.

Francis’ opening was part of his mercy-before-doctrine drive, which welcomes outcasts to the church rather than use dogma to keep people out. But for conservative Catholics, it was another reason to feel aggrieved, after Francis appeared to suggest in 2015 that Lutherans could receive Catholic Communion, and, when asked about gay people in 2013, said, “Who am I to judge?”

It was enough to start talk of a schism in the church. In February, anonymous conservatives in Rome responded by putting up posters attacking the pope, while rumors spread of prelates plotting to make him resign.

Mueller’s senior role as the the head of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith gave his criticism extra weight. But his nationality also provides a key to understanding the roots of the row — one that has been raging for years and started not in the Vatican, but in Germany, long before Francis was pope.

“With ‘Amoris Laetitia,’ Pope Francis simply took sides in a battle which German bishops have been fighting for years,” said Julius Mueller-Meiningen, a Vatican expert who covers the Holy See for Christ & Welt, the religious supplement of the German weekly Die Zeit.

The battle got underway in 1993 when three German bishops — Walter Kasper, Karl Lehmann and Oskar Saier — had a letter read out in all the churches of their dioceses stating it was time to talk about the rule on people who remarry after divorcing.

Arguing that there should be wiggle room “in complex, individual cases,” they used the kind of language Francis would employ almost a quarter of a century later.
A Dec. 8, 2015, photo of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI in St. Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican.
A Dec. 8, 2015, photo of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI in St. Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican. (Gregorio Borgia / Associated Press)

Back then, there was another conservative German heading the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith — Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later to become Pope Benedict XVI. He shot back with a strongly worded letter to his fellow Germans, telling them to stick to the rules.

“If the divorced are remarried civilly, they find themselves in a situation that objectively contravenes God’s law,” he wrote.

“Consequently,” he added, “they cannot receive Holy Communion as long as this situation persists.”

Kasper and Lehmann continued the debate in an informal group of prelates, nicknamed the St. Gallen group after the village in Switzerland where they met.

Among their discussions: Who would be the next pope?

Mueller-Meiningen said he was told that, before the 2005 conclave to elect the successor to Pope John Paul II, the cardinals talked about Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio of Buenos Aires as a possibility.

But the group’s plans to elect a reformer like Bergoglio were thwarted when Ratzinger was picked instead.

“After the election of Ratzinger, the group met for the last time in January 2006, then broke up,” said Mueller-Meiningen. But then Benedict unexpectedly resigned in 2013. He cited health reasons, though rumors swirled at the time that he was also worn down by bitter power struggles behind the scenes at the Vatican. In any event, with his departure, the German cardinals “had a second chance,” Mueller-Meiningen said.

Again the group supported the candidacy of Bergoglio, and this time their man won. Cardinal Bergoglio became Pope Francis.

A year after his election, Francis invited Kasper to address a consistory of cardinals, where the German prelate re-pitched his ideas about granting Communion to people who divorce and remarry.

Conservative cardinals were quick to react. Five of them published a book-length explanation in 2014 about why the Communion ban could not be lifted. Among them were American Cardinal Raymond Burke and two Germans, Mueller and Walter Brandmueller.

Undeterred, Francis held two synods in 2014 and 2015 that discussed the issue. “The German-language discussion group at the second synod, including Mueller and Kasper, had the most eloquent debating,” said Andrea Tornielli, a Vatican expert at the website Vatican Insider.
The sun sets over St Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican on March 9, 2013.
The sun sets over St Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican on March 9, 2013. (Christopher Furlong / Getty Images)

George Pell, a conservative Australian cardinal, told France’s Le Figaro newspaper that the synod debate was just the latest episode in a long-running theological battle between Kasper and Ratzinger/Benedict.

After the synods, in April 2016, Francis produced “Amoris Laetitia,” in which he wrote, “It is possible that in an objective situation of sin,” a person can be helped to live in God’s grace, and in certain cases, “this can include the help of the sacraments.”

Translation: In some cases, a sinner — say, someone who was divorced and remarried — can receive Communion, the central sacrament of Catholicism.

This time, four cardinals, including Burke and two Germans, Brandmueller and Joachim Meisner, wrote to Francis in September asking whether “Amoris Laetitia” broke with existing doctrine.

When they received no response, they went public with the letter in November.

Conservatives chimed in to lend support. Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia said last month that he wanted Francis to answer the questions posed in the letter.

“How can it be true that people can receive Communion when they’re living in an adulterous union today? How is that possible, when the church says it’s not possible?” he asked the independent Catholic website Crux.

Crux editor John Allen said American Catholics were divided, with some bishops — such as Chaput — insisting that the doctrine was unchanged, while others, including the archbishops of Chicago and Washington, saying Communion for divorced Catholics can be acceptable in some circumstances.

“There is no great ferment among rank-and-file Catholics, but the inside-baseball crowd is borderline obsessed, strongly divided in the same way as Europe,” he said. “Liberals see it as a long-overdue gesture of pastoral generosity, while conservatives see it as symptomatic of Francis’ lack of clarity on doctrine — and they are going at it hammer and tongs.”

In Africa, where the church is battling a long tradition of polygamy, Cardinal Wilfrid Napier, the archbishop of Durban, South Africa, tweeted, “If Westerners in irregular situations can receive Communion, are we to tell our polygamists and other ‘misfits’ that they too are allowed?”

But in February, the German bishops’ conference backed the concept of case-by-case flexibility, stating, “Catholics who have been remarried under civil law after a divorce are invited to go to the church, participate in their lives and mature as living members of the church.”

On the same day, Mueller’s interview appeared in Il Timone, showing yet again how the country where the debate started remains split on the question.

“We are called to help people, little by little, have a full relationship with God,” Mueller said, before adding, “But we can’t give discounts.”

Get AQ Email Updates

One comment on “Conservative opposition to Pope Francis spurs talk of a schism

  1. The Revolt That Isn’t There

    APR 18 ’17
    Posted by Mundabor

    The LA Times is very afraid.

    The Los Angeles Times has the usual mediocre heap of organic waste concerning the Church. On Easter Monday – evidently short on things to write about – they invented a story about the Vatican that fully reflect the face news mindset of the libtard media.

    The article is wrong in so many ways you know it was written by people, and for people, unable to think logically. It presupposes a revolt against Francis that never took place. It places the heart and epicentre of the revolt in what is no more than timidity and cowardice of one of Francis’ useful idiots (Cardinal Mueller). It depicts the Church like a party or a public company: something that can simply change course, and that’s that.

    The very way the argument is presented (along the lines of “some say church doctrine has changed, the enemies of the Pope says it hasn’t; some of them are very powerful, like Mueller”) is laughably absurd and clearly shows the total absence of a Catholic mindset. Nor is it any excuse that many Cardinals and Bishops seem to lack the mindset, too. It’s not difficult to know how the Church works. A journalist writing about Catholicism should actually be on top of the basics. But no, we have the blind writing for the stupid. Commiefornia for you.

    What angers me – besides the total ignorance of the basics of Catholicism – is the whiff of Stalinism that comes out of the article. It reads like a piece describing the obscure working of a powerful lobby of enemies of progress. The sad truth is that they aren’t the former, and don’t have the gut to be the latter. What they do is meowing around, even as they keep stating what a nice chap Francis is and how all his heresies are in fact very orthodox, if we bend over backwards as we should.

    The article appeared yesterday. I think the LA Times needed some spitting on Catholicism to kick off the post Easter season. The sources are all pretty old, so there is no “news” to report about. It’s just a marmalade jar prepared before the time for use when there is some extra space available to spit on the Church.

    What is worst of all, though, is this: such articles may persuade the one or other among this bunch of cowards that they are really working on some kind of “resistance”. Fake news creating fake ideas in Mickey Mouse “conservative” prelates.

    What a bunch of baloney. There is no resistance among the hierarchy. What passes for such is a limited number of people not able to do more than whisper some truth whilst Francis shouts his heresies, and they even do so whilst saying that Francis is on their side. There is a desert of cowardice and heresy that at this point only Divine intervention will cause to cease. Francis is now in the fifth year of his disgraceful Pontificate, and the number of FrancisCardinals and FrancisBishops keeps growing unchallenged. If he lives another couple of years it is clear that the point of no return, barring a divine intervention, will be reached. I am pretty sure it will get worse before it gets better. This is what we get for tolerating a hierarchy for which heresy must be explained away, or meowed against, rather than stomped and destroyed in front of the entire catholic community.

    The revolt that isn’t there is allegedly fueled by cartoon Cardinals who can’t do their job of challenging the clown Pope.

    Lord, have mercy!

Leave a Reply