Unrest at the Vatican; reassurances backfire

Unrest at the Vatican; reassurances backfire

By Phil Lawler | Feb 14, 2017

What in the world is going on in Rome this week?

First the Vatican press office issues a statement from the Council of Cardinals, supporting the Pope. It would certainly be news if the Council of Cardinals did not support the Pope. But why was this statement newsworthy? Why did the Council thank the Pontiff in February for a speech he delivered to the Roman Curia in December? Is there any way to see this message as something other than damage control—as a bid to reassure the world that the increasingly evident tensions within the Catholic hierarchy are not tearing the Church apart?

Unfortunately, the evidence of those tensions continues to mount. Today the Vatican press launched a book by Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio, backing the German/Maltese/Argentine interpretation of Amoris Laetitia. So now Cardinal Coccopalmerio, the Vatican’s top official on matters canonical, is in direct conflict with Cardinal Gerhard Müller, the top official on matters doctrinal. If the Coccopalmerio book was intended to quiet questions about the dubia, it will inevitably fail, just as yesterday’s odd press release predictably failed to calm concerns about intramural Vatican conflicts. The universal Church does not need one more prelate’s personal reading of the papal document; we need a definitive answer, which can only come from the Pope himself.

But there’s more. After the Vatican announced a press conference for the launch of the Coccopalmerio book—with enough ballyhoo to confirm the impressions that this was a bid to end the debate—the cardinal himself failed to appear for the event. The cardinal’s office explained that he had a scheduling conflict.

Now wait just a minute. If you are a publisher, planning the launch of a new book, the very first thing you do is make sure the author will be available for the press conference. If you are the author, and a date is suggested, the very first thing you do is check for potential conflicts. Are we really expected to believe that neither the author nor the publisher did the very first thing to ensure that the press conference would be a success? If this book (a booklet, really) was considered so important, why couldn’t the cardinal rearrange his schedule to attend the press conference, even if he did have a conflict?

Rumors of intrigue are always circulating around the Vatican. But in recent weeks the rumor mill has been spinning at a fearsome pace, churning out disturbing reports that are, alas, not easily dismissed. Is the situation really as tense and volatile as those rumors suggest? If the public announcements of the past two days were designed to convince us that it’s business as usual at the Vatican, they have failed utterly.

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2017/02/14/unrest-at-the-vatican-reassurances-backfire/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

5 comments on “Unrest at the Vatican; reassurances backfire

  1. The least someone left in authority there ( which may be changing hourly) could do is invite Mel Brooks in to film this bolshevikian farce-in-progress.

    My guess? Ticket sales would be at least triple those sold for Blazing Saddles.

  2. More like Bride of Frankenpope, with Igor played by Cardinal Marx !! You all can name the Bride !

  3. You would probably need the Marx Brothers, the Three Stooges, Monty Python, and Mel Brooks to do justice to this modernist pontificate.



    Young FrankenPope: The Early Modernist Years

    • I defer to your superior insights into absurdity, Howl, and rise in support of your motion.

      In passing, there might be opportunities to inject some walk-on parts for computer-generated appearances by Soupy Sales and Howdy Doody, as well.

  4. While a Jesuit education helps to grasp the absurdity of the modernist dialectic of the Spirit of Vatican II, British and American Jewish comedians are occasionally needed to express it fully and thoroughly. On Bergoglian progressive modernism I have to defer to Mel Brooks’ interpretation of the Frankenstein story. He was married to a lapsed Italian Catholic from New York, so maybe that explains some of it.

Leave a Reply