Two Newmans and Two Catholic Springs

Two Newmans and Two Catholic Springs


On a Tuesday in 1852, the thirteenth of July for the literary record since it was a day important for English letters, Blessed John Henry Newman mounted the pulpit of Oscott College, its halls relatively new though designed by Joseph Potter and Augustus Pugin to recall the best of the Tudor times before the depredations of the eighth Henry. Always attentive to signs of decay, at 51 he claimed to be entering old age but was ready for a second breath, both for himself and his Church. That sermon, “The Second Spring,” is as poetic as homiletic, and could take its place in the annals of free verse as one of its most lyrical samples.

The occasion was the gathering of the First Provincial Synod of Westminster, when the Catholic episcopate had been restored, and hope was mingled with a quality of caution, for the road ahead was not straight and smooth and there were no sureties of rest along the way. That is why Newman took the temperature of the times:

Have we any right to take it strange, if, in this English land, the spring-time of the Church should turn out to be an English spring, an uncertain, anxious time of hope and fear, of joy and suffering,—of bright promise and budding hopes, yet withal, of keen blasts, and cold showers, and sudden storms?

The same might be preached today, in this peculiar period when the Church seems as conflicted as our nation, for the issues at hand have never been greater and the commentaries on them both in Church and State are almost burlesque in their shallowness and venality. Napoleon called China a sleeping giant and various sources have said the same of the Catholic Church. During the present election season, fevered as it is with unprecedented bitterness and banality, the Church could almost pass as a giant more comatose than slumbering.

If anything has stirred the Church, rusty when urban and flaccid when suburban, it has been the discovery of documents revealing cynical attempts by political strategist to subvert and suborn the institution, stripping her of supernatural credentials to become a tool of the State, like the Gallican Church of the French Revolution. Leaked emails from February 10-11, 2012 record exchanges entitled “Opening for a Catholic Spring?” between the current manager of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, John Podesta, and Sandy Newman, president of a political action group called Voices for Progress. Sandy Newman is certainly no heir to John Henry Newman nor are his visions of Spring like those of the Second Spring preached at Oscott. For Sandy Newman, “There needs to be a Catholic Spring in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic church.” The mandate for contraception coverage in medical plans might be a rallying point to “plant the seeds of the revolution.”

At the risk of fueling the imaginings of conspiracy theorists, it has been said that paranoia is just having the right information. But even a well-tempered analyst should be taken aback by Mr. Podesta’s reply: “We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up.” Podesta, who professes to be a Catholic, is past president of the Center for American Progress, a think tank that promotes “LGBT equality and women’s reproductive health and rights.”

To usher in this kind of man-made Spring, John Podesta recommended enlisting the help of the daughter of Robert F. Kennedy, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, who addressed the dissident organization Call to Action in 2008, and who has served on the board of the National Catholic Reporter.

Sandy—not John Henry—Newman acknowledged that he has a “total lack of understanding of the Catholic Church” since he is Jewish, and thus he deferred to John Podesta for implementing this anthropogenic climate change. But he does have experience in using the Catholic Church as an agent for community organizing, and in 1993 he hired a young man named Barack Obama to register voters in Illinois. Later, the same Obama sought to align Cardinal Bernardin with the United Neighborhood Organizations of Chicago, affiliated with Obama’s own group called the Developing Communities Project. In this he was assisted by Monsignor John J. Egan, another community organizer, who was a close associate of the primeval theorist of social restructuring, Saul Alinsky. That man boasted of his strategy, which was to enlist the sympathies of well-intentioned, if naïve, Catholic clerics, in his essentially Marxist agenda. He said, “To [expletive] your enemies, you’ve first got to seduce your allies.” Eventually, even Cardinal Bernardin disassociated himself with the more extreme organizers including Obama. Hillary Clinton clearly admired Alinsky, but her senior thesis at Wellesley College disagreed with his view that systemic change is “impossible from the inside” and requires radical revision from external engineering.

Well known is the dedication Alinsky wrote for his Rules for Radicals which was the chief object of Hillary Clinton’s college writing:

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history … the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—Lucifer.

Speaking of Lucifer, the e-mails of Newman’s advice to Podesta are sulphuric like Screwtape’s animadversions in the Screwtape Letters of C.S. Lewis. They also remind one of the lines of the other Newman, the blessed one, in “The Patristical Idea of Christ”:

Surely, there is at this day a confederacy of evil, marshaling its hosts from all parts of the world, organizing itself, taking its measures, enclosing the Church of Christ as in a net, and preparing the way for a general Apostasy from it. Whether this very Apostasy is to give birth to Antichrist, or whether he is still to be delayed, as he has already been delayed so long, we cannot know; but at any rate this Apostasy, and all its tokens and instruments, are of the Evil One, and savor of death…. He promises you civil liberty; he promises you equality; he promises you trade and wealth; he promises you a remission of taxes; he promises you reform. This is the way in which he conceals from you the kind of work to which he is putting you; he tempts you to rail against your rulers and superiors; he does so himself, and induces you to imitate him; or he promises you illumination,—he offers you knowledge, science, philosophy, enlargement of mind. He scoffs at times gone by; he scoffs at every institution which reveres them. He prompts you what to say, and then listens to you, and praises you, and encourages you. He bids you mount aloft. He shows you how to become as gods. Then he laughs and jokes with you, and gets intimate with you; he takes your hand, and gets his fingers between yours, and grasps them, and then you are his.

Addressing the 2015 Women in the World Summit, Hillary Clinton coldly declared that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” Not present at that summit was Saint Hildegarde of Bingen, who could have enlivened the proceedings by her description of the wiles and ways of Alinsky’s Lucifer:

Religion he will endeavor to make convenient. He will say that you need not fast and embitter your life by renunciation… It will suffice to love God… He will preach free love and tear asunder family ties. He will scorn everything holy, and he will ridicule all graces of the Church with devilish mockery. He will condemn humility and foster proud and gruesome dogmas. He will tear down that which God has taught in the Old and New Testaments and maintain that sin and vice are not sin and vice…

So there we are at this crossroads of culture and, more than that, of civilization itself. Two Newmans proffer two Springtimes and they are not occasional variations of a common climate. Our nation has endured recent years of eroding faith and moral reason. It cannot endure several years more in the confidence that the erosion can be reversed as though it were just the habit of a cyclical season. There is a better prospect, but it is possible only if Catholics assent to the lively oracles of the Gospel and cast their votes and vows against those who are against it. The Newman who is blessed saw a Catholic Spring in the pulpit at Oscott that is not the clandestine plot of e-mails:

I listen, and I hear the sound of voices, grave and musical, renewing the old chant, with which Augustine greeted Ethelbert in the free air upon the Kentish strand. It comes from a long procession, and it winds along the cloisters. Priests and Religious, theologians from the schools, and canons from the Cathedral, walk in due precedence. And then there comes a vision of well-nigh twelve mitred heads; and last I see a Prince of the Church, in the royal dye of empire and of martyrdom, a pledge to us from Rome of Rome’s unwearied love, a token that that goodly company is firm in Apostolic faith and hope.

Get AQ Email Updates

4 comments on “Two Newmans and Two Catholic Springs

  1. Quote: “Whether this very Apostasy is to give birth to Antichrist, or whether he is still to be delayed, as he has already been delayed so long, we cannot know; but at any rate this Apostasy, and all its tokens and instruments, are of the Evil One, and savor of death….”

    The trenchant and grave admonition of the Newman quote on the Great Apostasy and the Antichrist might elude the damned and the anti-Catholic bigots on Hillary’s campaign staff, obsessed as they are with murdering more unborn children in coming years and forcing Catholics to pay for such abortions. Sin makes people stupid, but Hillary’s staff are going overboard in attempting to prove that.

    It makes one wonder if the emails being exposed by WikiLeaks are not part of the seals and scrolls of the Apocalypse. Just scroll down for more evil to be exposed. Some priest really ought to remind Mr. Podesta & Company of the dangers of hell and damnation. Poor Senator Kaine. He is so incompetent at explaining the basics of Catholicism it brings tears to your eyes.

  2. HowlinglyAbsurd says:

    Some priest really ought to remind Mr. Podesta & Company of the dangers of hell and damnation.

    How about a feisty lady such as Ann Barnhardt? CAUTION: Graphic language (some redacted)

    HELL: So Much Worse Than You Can Possibly Imagine

    This entry was posted on October 11, 2016.

    Pretty much everyone in post-Christian post-western culture today knows someone or is a close relative of someone who is divorced and “remarried”, someone who is shacking up and fornicating, someone who is just simply fornicating, aka “hooking up”, even someone who is aberrosexual. And sadly, everyone knows someone who is married and contracepts – because EVERYONE on a statistical basis contracepts today. And contraception, like all of the other sins against the Sixth Commandment above, is a mortal sin.

    Add to this the near-total disintegration of and mass apostasy from The Church, with Pope Bergoglio now executing what he believes to be the coup de grace, and people commit these sins with total impunity. There isn’t even the slightest hesitation or moral qualm about any of these sins. In fact, how many Novus Ordo “c”atholics and Prostestants are right now saying, “Boy, those Super-dox rigorist Trad Catholics sure are getting a wake-up call now, huh? The reason they are all so angry is because they can’t deal with the fact that their bullshit position on contraception, homosexuality and divorce has been wrong all along… because Fraaaaaaaancis.”



    We know what the truth is. We’re not backing off. In fact, it is just the opposite.

    Anyway… If one were to ask me what I think the single worst thing Pope Bergoglio has said or done in this ongoing papacy, I would say without hesitation that it is his denial of the existence of hell or damnation. He first did this in an interview with the Italian atheist and Freemason newspaper magnate, Eugenio Scalfari, in March of ARSH 2015.

    What happens to that lifeless soul? Will it be punished? How?

    Francis’ answer is very clear: there is no punishment, but the annihilation of that soul. All the others will participate in the bliss of living in the presence of the Father. The annihilated souls will not be part of that banquet; with the death of the body their journey is ended and this is the basis for the missionary work in the Church: to save the lost souls.

    Pope Bergoglio then reiterated this in his manifesto, Amoris Laetitia, which was so-named in Latin, a language which Bergoglio and his toadies despise and refuse to use EXCEPT in the naming of this foul document because the most accurate and learned translation of “Amoris Laetitia” is “The Exuberance of Sodomy”. My post on that including a letter from a professional Latinist HERE. The name of that document is 100% intentional, folks. Think how evil these foul creatures have to be to not only falsely promulgate such a satanic document in the name of Peter – but to get a good, hearty laugh out of naming it, “The Exuberance of Sodomy”. May God have mercy on them, and us.

    Anyway, in Amoris Laetitia/Exuberance of Sodomy, Pope Bergoglio and his ghostwriter Tucho “Heal Me With Your Mouth: The Art of Kissing” Fernandez, wrote:

    “No one can be condemned for ever, because that is not the logic of the Gospel!”
    (Amoris Laetitia, n. 297).

    This is yet another winking denial of the existence of hell by these fiends. Folks, the denial of hell and its eternal torments is the most transcendently and thoroughly poisonous lie in the universe. One need not even believe in the heresy of universalism, that is to say that ALL people are eventually saved and achieve the beatific vision. One need not go even that far. Bergoglio spews the lie of soul annihilation – that is to say that human beings are simply snuffed out of existence by God upon their death if they don’t achieve the beatific vision. This filthy lie has a certain attraction to everyone, even the faithful. Isn’t there a certain bewitching comfort that comes from the idea that “if I’m wrong about this Christianity stuff, the worst that will happen to me will be that I simply cease to be, that I will die and then POOF! ‘Lights out’.” Who among us will not confess to, in periods of particular suffering in our lives, wistfully longing for an “unending dreamless sleep”?

    Who among us has NOT done everything we could to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ precisely because in the backs of our minds, we subconsciously tell ourselves that the people around us who are outside the Church, or living lives of unrepentant mortal sin, will be merely “snuffed out”, instead of facing manfully the truth that human beings who die outside the Church, and/or in unrepentant mortal sin will spend all eternity in hell, tormented in an unceasing and ever-increasing agony? How often do we fail our fellow man in charity, instead choosing charity’s antipode, indifference, borne precisely from our own deep-seated concession and desire for the lie of soul annihilation to be true? No, the siren’s song of nihilism, with Pope Bergoglio, as its loudest-ever “chanteuse”, is bewitching countless human beings of every stripe. Catholics cite Bergoglio as reason to apostatize. Protestants are ratified in their heresy and schism. Pagans are ratified in their denial of Christ. Atheists are ratified in their atheism.

    What Hell Is Like

    Now for the truly useful and spiritually profitable information. If you have ever struggled to answer or explain to someone why it is that we should not sin, why it matters whether or not person A is having sex with person B, listen up, because this is life-changing information – information that could literally make the difference for you or someone you love between eternal bliss or eternal agony and torment.

    The first reason we should not sin is because our sins offend God. And because God loves us infinitely, it is perhaps more profitable to think of our offending God more as breaking His Heart. Just as a parent who has a child that does drugs has their heart broken by that child’s actions that hurt himself, God, because His love for us is infinite and perfect, and because He is Perfect Good, is infinitely offended, or we could say has His Heart infinitely broken, by even the smallest of our sins. If you would like to read more about Fear of The Lord, might I suggest my ambiguously-titled essay, “THE ONE ABOUT… FEAR OF THE LORD.”

    As with heaven, the modern conception of hell is extremely childish and inadequate. Hell is not MERELY a hot place with fire and demons poking you with sticks. These conceptions of the torment and agony of hell are as woefully inadequate as the image of heaven as a very boring place with blue, sunny sky above with beatified souls reposing on white fluffy clouds, dreamily stroking harps whilst angels, depicted as pudgy, bewinged babies, flit about like agreeable houseflies.

    I’m sorry, but what, exactly is so attractive about that ridiculous and banal image of heaven? And what is so awful about that image of hell? Yeah, it sounds unpleasant, but it doesn’t exactly strike terror in one’s heart – especially not terror at levels sufficiently high enough to stop robust, well-formed lads and lasses in the flower of youth (or morbidly obese, arthritic octogenarians, for that matter) from fornicating with each other.

    Let me describe to you what hell is like for fornicators. I use fornicators as our first example because there are just so darn many. Any sex outside of valid marriage is fornication, folks. No matter how much the parties in question might “love each other”. Post-western, post-Christian culture is AWASH in fornication.

    In hell, we will be in close proximity to those people also in hell that we cooperated or engaged in sin with. I suspect this would be because the damned are obsessed and consumed with hatred and rage, and thus damned humans themselves will gravitate towards those that they personally sinned with. Obviously, fornicators will be in immediate proximity to each other. And so, what hell will entail will be human souls raging at each other, screaming the most vile insults, profanities, and perhaps even physical attacks after the General Resurrection when ALL SOULS will be reunited to their bodies. Why? Because the partner in fornication was a full cooperator in the mortal sin that presumably resulted in the eternal damnation, and thus the fornicators will hate and blame each other for their own damnation.

    I received an email from a woman not long after I first wrote about this. She had a boyfriend, as most gals today do at some point. They were very average American 20-somethings. They were in a steady relationship, lived in separate houses, but fornicated regularly. They were attracted to each other, loved each other, got along well and there was no history of fighting, and certainly no abuse. The woman told me in this email that she started exploring religion, reading up, and settled into serious study of Catholicism and Catholic moral teaching. Obviously, her fornication with her boyfriend began to nag at her conscience until she finally acknowledged that she had to stop having sex outside of marriage.

    The day arrived when she finally had to talk to her boyfriend, explain what she had learned, and tell him that it was very important that they stop having sex. She did not want to end the relationship – just stop having sex until marriage.

    Up until that point, their relationship had been smooth with no major fights – they got on very well, and the boyfriend treated her well. She fully expected that they were on the path to marriage. There was never even the slightest hint of abuse or disrespect in the modern sense (I qualify that because the act of fornication itself is a sign of massive disrespect, but you know what I’m trying to convey).

    The last words she heard her boyfriend say to her were bellowed at her in a screaming rage as she quickly left his house in fear, after explaining to him that the Church teaches that fornication is a mortal sin and that it was important to stop having sex until they were married: “YOU F***ING C***!”

    This sort of rage – seemingly out of the blue and unthinkable to her just a few minutes before it happened – was a foretaste of hell. It was a foretaste of the deep, raging hatred that humans who cooperate and enable sin with others feel, and if they don’t repent and die in their sin, will spend all eternity drowning in. And folks, no human being will take hell “stoically”. All of us who end up damned will rage eternally. We will rage at God, we will rage at the angels and saints in heaven, we will rage at all of the other humans in hell, and we will rage at the demons. The other humans in hell and all of the demons will spend eternity raging right back at us.

    This is what fornicators, sodomites, heck EVERYBODY MUST be told. If you do not stop this, you will spend eternity RAGING at this person that you claim to love. And they will spend eternity RAGING at you.

    I am blessed to have observed/experienced demoniacal, hellish human rage like this more than once in my life. I have seen the faces of people I love twist and contort into a countenance still recognizable, but yet completely “other”. I have seen eyes blazing with rage and hatred of me, with what can only be described as the fire of hell behind them. I have seen the lips curl back, exposing the teeth as fangs. I have been raged at by people I love for merely existing, and I thank God for it because it was the gift of experiencing a foretaste of hell. And it was something much better than a vision – because it was real. It is a spiritual insight of the highest and gravest importance.

    If you have never experienced this, pray God you never do, and thank God that you can be aware of it from my third-party description. And pray God that you be saved from hell, because hell will be an unending, ever-increasing orgy of rage. And what is perhaps most terrifying about this is that those who are damned will be exactly the same species of rage monster that others are to them. As terrifying as it is to think of someone you love raging at you for all eternity, what is even worse is the thought of you yourself raging forever at the people you “love”. Do you love your kids? Well, if you don’t make it to heaven, you will spend eternity hating your kids. And make no mistake, the damned rage at EVERYONE, whether they are in hell with them, or in heaven. There are no alliances, no friendships, no family. Everyone is alone in the way that the Diabolical Narcissists among us are alone. They are islands, utterly cut-off from others by their freely chosen self-purgation of all love.

    So even if you end up damned, but everyone you have ever loved makes it to heaven, because you are damned and they are not, you will hate them for their beatitude. You will spend eternity in hell looking up towards the heaven which you will never, ever see, and cursing all those in it. And the people you “loved” most in the world, will be the people that you hate most when you are in hell. If they are in hell with you, you will blame them for your damnation. If they are in heaven, you will hate them for their beatitude (remember the demonic emotional palate: anger, hated, ENVY and fear), and for not doing more in life to prevent your own damnation.

    Let me say that again, because it is extremely important: the people you “loved” most in the world, will be the people that you hate most when you are in hell. We should all be motivated by this.

    Fornicators in hell will hate their sex partners.
    Parents in hell will hate their children.
    Children in hell will hate their parents.
    Friends in hell will hate their friends.
    Priests in hell will hate their flock.
    Catholics in hell will hate their priests, bishops and popes.
    Spouses in hell will hate their spouse.
    Everyone in hell will hate God.

    An Urgent Warning to Those Who Are Divorced and “Remarried”

    Right now the question of “marriages” after one or both spouses has been previously civilly divorced is at the top of the headlines due to the satanic words and deeds of Pope Bergoglio, who is probably the counter-analogue to John the Baptist. John the Baptist, as the Forerunner of The Christ, had as his ministry the calling of people to repentance, the “making straight the crooked paths”, and John the Baptist was ultimately beheaded for defending the sanctity of marriage by condemning the false marriage of King Herod Antipas to Herodias. Pope Bergoglio being a near-perfect opposite of John the Baptist is calling people to remain in sin and to hate The Law, is sowing chaos on a daily basis, and his central point of attack is marriage and the family.

    If you are in a so-called “second marriage” of any stripe, and you want some genuinely helpful and spiritually profitable information, put out the cat and read on:

    The Church has taught that in circumstances in which people are in “marriages” when one or both spouses have their true spouse still living, that the couple in question MUST MUST MUST stop having sex at a bare minimum. You CANNOT have sex with someone who is not your spouse. You cannot have more than ONE living spouse – that is, your first spouse. Why? Because marriage is INDISSOLUBLE. Period. These are the plain, clear words of Jesus Christ Himself. We all know them: Those whom God has joined together, let no man put asunder. He who puts away his wife and marries another commits adultery. It does not get any clearer than that.

    You can’t have sex with your “second spouse” because YOU ARE NOT MARRIED TO THEM.

    I don’t care what the civil law says. I don’t care that you will have to pay half of your joint estate and monthly support if you “divorce”. It is also “legal” to murder children in utero. What is your point? It is The Divine and Natural Law that is the question – heaven or hell. I don’t give a CRAP what our Freemasonic post-Christian culture says is “law” is on this matter. The question is utterly moot. If you have sex with someone who is not your spouse, you are fornicating at minimum, and committing adultery if either of you has already been married to someone else. You HAVE TO STOP HAVING SEX AT MINIMUM. What is beyond the “at minimum”? Separation. Aping marriage is scandalous.

    Now, let’s think about what we have just learned about hell. You say, “No way! There’s no way I’m going to stop having sex with my “spouse”! We love each other! There is no way you or anyone else are going to separate us!”

    Listen up: I believe that you “love” your “spouse”. If you don’t stop having sex, and you both die unrepentant of your adulterous fornication, you will spend all of eternity in hell, in proximity to each other, hating and raging at each other for contributing to each others’ damnation, FOR ALL ETERNITY. Think about that. Now, tell me again that you “love” your “spouse”, but are unwilling to stop having sex. If you understand the plain English of what I have just told you your eternal fate will be, and you still refuse to stop having sex for however many years remain for you on this earth, well, my hands are clean of your blood.

    THIS is what every Catholic priest on this planet should be bellowing from the pulpit, from the top – Pope Benedict XVI – all the way down to the lowest, wettest-behind-the-ears parish priest. This is what neighbors, friends and family members should be explaining to those around them. But do we? No. Because we are bad people, more concerned about earthly human respect than whether or not other human beings spend eternity in hell, separated from God, and raging and being raged at by the very people that they claim to “love”. Because it is just so much easier to believe Pope Bergoglio’s lies about soul annihilation, isn’t it?

    Why Does God Permit Such A Horrible Eternal Fate?

    The thing to remember about the torments of hell is that they are permitted by God as a MERCY. Yes, that’s right. Those humans who are damned will be tormented not only by demons, but also by other people in hell, most especially those wretched souls that were known to them and complicit in their sins in life, as a MERCIFUL DISTRACTION from the loss of God for all eternity. If God truly did not love every one of His creations, including all of the demons and all men who are damned, He would consign them to an eternity of silent solitude in which the full horror of the eternal loss of God Himself would be at the fore of their consciousness with no rest and no distraction. Instead, in His Mercy, which extends even to the damned, He permits torment in order to give some sort of distraction – which in and of itself is actually a kind of relief from the horror of eternity separated from Perfect Love, Perfect Good, Perfect Truth and Perfect Beauty.

    Here is a detail from Fra Angelico’s Last Judgment, in which damned humans are shown fighting and biting each other. Note how one of the two men biting each other is shown to be a monk.

    THIS is what awaits fornicators. So you REALLY love that little chickie-poo, huh? Well, the next time you get an erection thinking about fornicating with her, think about the hell that awaits the both of you. If you really love her, and don’t want to spend eternity raging at her, and her at you, you’ll stop. And the same goes for the females….

    THIS is what awaits adulterers – including the best-intentioned civilly divorced and “remarried” couples. If you really love each other, you’ll STOP HAVING SEX AT MINIMUM.

    This is what awaits sodomites – can you imagine what hell will be like for these miserable sodomite wretches with their dozens/hundreds/thousands of sex partners? Can you imagine the enormous throngs of interconnected sodomites in an eternal frenzy of raging hatred, cursing and physically attacking each other, blaming each other for their damnation and loss of God?

    Think about hell. Tell other people about hell. It is clear that love of God is a non-starter in this post-Christian culture. So be it. There is another means of catechesis, repentance and conversion. THINK, TALK AND PRAY ABOUT HELL, and beg God every day to save us from it.

    And for the love of God, go to confession. In fact, make a general confession, just to be sure.

    I really, really hope this helps.

    The Last Judgment, Detail, Fra Angelico, 1425, Church of San Marco, Florence

  3. Face to face, in person. Exorcists should show up at her campaign rallies with holy water and crucifixes displayed, to test the Clinton campaign team’s reaction. Sprinkle holy water on the crowd.

  4. People should consider the likelihood that this deranged woman is possessed by demons and what that will mean for American Christians to be under a dictatorship directly controlled by Satan, if such a regime comes into power. Get ready. Are we about to witness one of the chastisements predicted by the Blessed Virgin in the Fatima Prophecies?

Leave a Reply