Women try on hijabs at Boston College to show Islam doesn’t oppress women

Women try on hijabs at Boston College to show Islam doesn’t oppress women

[More Catholic dhimmitude: Jesuit BC coeds going slumming as hijabbed Muslimas]

MARCH 18, 2016 BY DEACON ROBERT SPENCER @ www.jihadwatch.org/2016/03/women-try-on-hijabs-at-boston-college-to-show-islam-doesnt-oppress-women

“A lot of people want to stereotype and say that Islam oppresses women and makes them cover their hair, or something like that,” said the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim Student Association’s Ahad Arshad. Why, how could anyone get the idea that Islam oppresses women and makes them cover their hair? It’s inconceivable!

I do wonder, however, when Boston College, that fine Catholic school, will be holding a commemoration in honor of Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it. When will Boston College be celebrating the memory of Aqsa and Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? And of the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; and of Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; and of Amira Osman Hamid, who faces whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; and of the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; and of the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; and of the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; and of the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; and of the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; and of the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; and of the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; and of the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents, and all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?

When is their day? When will anyone stand in solidarity with them? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them?

null
BC Muslim Student Association Islamic Awareness Week

Women Try On Hijabs at Catholic Boston College Islamic Awareness Week Event,” by Susan Berry, Breitbart, March 18, 2016:

The first Islamic Awareness Week at Boston College featured an event in which women were invited to wear the Muslim hijab and learn more about the lives of Muslim women.

The “Hijab Booth” has been a popular event worldwide used to encourage Western empathy for Muslim women.

“A lot of people want to stereotype and say that Islam oppresses women and makes them cover their hair, or something like that,” Muslim Student Association (MSA) president Ahad Arshad said, according to The Heights, the newspaper of the Catholic Jesuit school and its surrounding community. “But obviously there are women who do it in their own free will, and it’s better if people can just see that.”

Arshad said the hijab event helps non-Muslims understand why Muslim women choose to wear the head garment.

“It eliminates that fear factor, like that ‘Oh this is so foreign to me, I’ve never seen that before,’” he said. “If you see it on campus, you know girls wearing hijabs and talking openly about it and how they’ve made that choice on their own, independently, it definitely makes it less alien.”

However, a recent Muslim educational video – “Salma and the Hijab” – featured a young Muslim girl who is taught by her mother that to choose not to wear the hijab – or to wear Western style clothing – would bring her “closer to Satan.”

Salma’s mother says in the animated video produced by Qatar’s government-owned Islamweb.net:

The hijab, my daughter, is a natural thing for the Muslim woman. The Prophet Muhammad ordered us to wear it, so anyone who abides by this is being obedient to Allah and His Prophet, and she gets many rewards. As for someone who does not wear the hijab, revealing parts of her body, like her hair, her arms, her neck or her legs – she is closer to Satan and denying Allah, the All Merciful. A Muslim woman must wear the hijab, and must not wear just any item of clothing she sees in the market. Islamic clothes have special requisites.

In December, Muslim women Asra Q. Nomani and Hala Arafa denounced these “hijab booth” events in which they claim Americans are getting “duped” by a Muslim sexist agenda. They say they would rather see Americans stand against the ideology of Islamism that represses women and demands Muslim women cover themselves.

Nomani and Arafa explain that while both were born into conservative families that had no edict for women to cover their hair, following the Iranian revolution of the minority Shia sect in 1979 and the rise of the “well-funded” Saudis from the majority Sunni sect, they “experienced bullying to cover [their] hair from men and boys.”

“This ideology promotes a social attitude that absolves men of sexually harassing women and puts the onus on the victim to protect herself by covering up,” the women write. “The Muslim Reform Movement, however, supports the right of Muslim women to have the option of wearing the hijab or not.”

“As Americans, we believe in freedom of religion,” the women state, adding:

But we need to clarify to those in universities, the media and discussion forums that in exploring the “hijab,” they are not exploring Islam, but rather the ideology of political Islam as practiced by the mullahs, or clerics, of Iran and Saudi Arabia, the Taliban in Afghanistan and the Islamic State.

Though Arshad says he himself has not experienced any “ignorance or hatred” at Boston College (BC), other colleges’ MSAs have been holding these types of awareness events.

“I have never really faced any stereotyping or ignorance or hatred, at least not to my face,” admits Arshad. “I can’t think of anyone who has done or said anything Islamophobic.”

The MSA president said the goal of Islamic Awareness Week is to present Islam as a “religion of peace.”

“Given that this is a Catholic university, and most students are Catholic, what better topic for Muslims to engage students with than someone as revered as Jesus?” he said.

The MSA at BC was reportedly launched six years ago as a means to educate people about Islam and gather together the Muslims on the campus.

The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) observes that the MSA of the United States and Canada was incorporated in January 1963, when members of the Muslim Brotherhood came together at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign with the goal of “spreading Islam as students in North America.”

“Islamic extremism is on the rise on college and university campuses across the United States,” IPT states. “The spread of radical Islamism on campuses has proven to be an effective tool to garner support and gain legitimacy, exploiting the right of free association with academic institutions.”

IPT maintains that the Muslim Brotherhood-influenced MSA often uses college and university campuses as a means to gain support through campaigns based on diversity and tolerance.

“International and domestic groups that advocate extremist or radical causes frequently host lectures and other events on campuses to shore up support and recruit members,” IPT states. “Indeed, universities are a fertile field for radicals searching for the next generation of activists and sympathizers.”…

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2016/03/19/women-try-on-hijabs-at-boston-college-to-show-islam-doesnt-oppress-women/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

2 comments on “Women try on hijabs at Boston College to show Islam doesn’t oppress women

  1. [More Catholic dhimmitude – this time on the part of Jesuit-educated university students]

    Jesuit Georgetown University Elects First Muslim Student Association President

    null
    Not your typical hijabbed Mulima

    by DR. SUSAN BERRY
    8 Mar 2016
    www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/08/jesuit-georgetown-university-elects-first-muslim-student-association-president/

    The Georgetown University Student Association (GUSA) has elected the first Muslim student to serve as its president at the school which brands itself as America’s “oldest Catholic and Jesuit institute of higher learning.

    Enushe Khan joined the board of the university Muslim Student Association (MSA) soon after arriving at Georgetown, and served as chair of Interfaith and Service for five semesters, reports The Hoya – the school’s oldest and largest student newspaper.

    According to the report, Khan’s Muslim identity has been an integral part of her campus activism from the start of her academic career at Georgetown. During her freshman year, Khan was elected to a seat on the GUSA after she observed a lack of halal foods that are required under Islamic dietary law on the school’s campus.

    “Food was a big issue, and that was sort of affecting my health,” Khan said. “That was a common trend with other Muslim students as well. It’s something that was never a concern for Dining or Auxiliary Services until it really came up in GUSA.”

    While a member of the GUSA senate, Khan reportedly called for both more halal and kosher foods to be more readily available at Georgetown’s dining facilities. As an MSA board member, she also worked to expand interfaith programming with other faith groups on campus.

    Khan said as GUSA president, she hopes to continue the same outreach she performed while on the MSA board.

    The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT), however, observes that the MSA of the United States and Canada was incorporated in January 1963, when members of the Muslim Brotherhood came together at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign with the goal of “spreading Islam as students in North America.”

    “Islamic extremism is on the rise on college and university campuses across the United States,” IPT continues. “The spread of radical Islamism on campuses has proven to be an effective tool to garner support and gain legitimacy, exploiting the right of free association with academic institutions.”

    Muslim Chaplain Imam Yahya Hendi said Khan’s election mirrors the Georgetown student body’s commitment to electing the most qualified candidate.

    “You have students from all over the world who came together to elect someone for the betterment of the community on the basis of what she can do, not on the basis of her gender, religion or ethnic background,” Hendi said. “And that’s what we need worldwide.”

    Khan’s running mate and the GUSA’s next vice president is Chris Fisk – a first generation college student and a member of the Georgetown Scholarship Program. As a Georgetown student who was only able to attend the school due to the financial aid package he received, Fisk said affordability is essential to the creation of a more diverse campus.

    “One thing is getting acceptance letters for people who are of low income, but it’s another thing getting financial aid packages,” Fisk said. “When I got my financial aid package from GSP, that was the day I knew I was coming to Georgetown, not necessarily when I got my acceptance letter.”

    Khan said her religious identity and Fisk’s socio-economic distinction made their campaign for office a success.

    “I think a big part of why this ticket happened and why this team happened, a lot of it played into our identities of coming from a sort of nontraditional Georgetown,” Khan said.

    GUSA Freshman senator Saad Bashir said Khan and Fisk’s election reveals Georgetown’s commitment to tolerance and inclusivity.

    “This election affirms some key values that Georgetown prides itself on such as equality and diversity, but it also tells the world that Georgetown’s student body will not sit idly as people’s faith or race or whatever reason is attacked,” Bashir said.

    “I can speak to how the Muslim community has tended to really isolate itself in the past,” Khan says. “You have these communities, these pockets here on campus who feel like they can’t engage with the rest of the Georgetown community. A big thing for us is how can we work with these groups to create a Georgetown where that’s no longer a fear.”

    Nevertheless, IPT maintains that the Muslim Brotherhood-influenced MSA often uses college and university campuses as a means to gain support through campaigns based on diversity and tolerance.

    “International and domestic groups that advocate extremist or radical causes frequently host lectures and other events on campuses to shore up support and recruit members,” IPT states. “Indeed, universities are a fertile field for radicals searching for the next generation of activists and sympathizers.”

    [Addendum from www.thecollegefix.com/post/26544 ]

    The Hoya reports that Khan and her running mate — Georgetown University Student Association’s Vice President Chris Fisk — essentially ran unopposed; their main opponents dropped out in early February and eventually Khan and Fisk only ran against a few write-in candidates.

    Khan and Fisk ran on a platform of “inclusivity” and “socio-economic inclusion” in an election that only saw a 33 percent student voter turnout, the lowest in recent years, the paper added.

    RELATED: Muslim Student Association demands all ‘Islamophobic speech’ be punished

    Write-in candidates against the Khan ticket have voiced concern over how the election was handled, telling The Hoya that the deck was stacked in favor of Khan and Fisk, who were already embedded into the top echelons of student government.

    “I think Georgetown students are going to be much more interested in looking into the reasons behind why there was only one ticket, why another ticket decided to get into the race so late …,” said student Reed Howard, one of the write-in candidates, adding the write-in rules allowed student government officials to throw out write-in votes that might have misspelled a name or formatted something incorrectly.

    “Write-in candidates were systematically disadvantaged from so-called ‘official candidates,’” added Courtney Maduike, another write-in candidate.

  2. I suggest a field trip to Syria , visiting ISIS headquarters , with some Jesuits along with pro Muslim bishops, and see how that works out !

Leave a Reply