QueerChurchmen almost come out
From: What’s Up With the Synod-Church? (successor to What’s Up With the Synod? See angelqueen.org/2015/10/27/where-were-going-from-here-forward-always-forward/ )
Wherein Ann Barnhardt JUSTLY discriminates against Fr. James Martin, Essjay, who is a raging, flaming queen.
OCT 28, 2015 by ANN BARNHARDT
Why is this man a celebrity Catholic?
Why do we engage in “civilised” discussions about the things he says? Why do Catholic commentators start their critiques of his “progressivist” campaigning by gushing over the wonderful “spiritual” books he has produced that make people feel so very nice? Why does this man’s celebrity status, his visits to the Colbert show, his clear hatred of the Holy Faith, create this untouchable aura about him? What is it? Is he known to be especially litigious? Or is it possible that we are so cowed by the homosexualist underground in the Church that we have allowed this man to berate the faithful…
…for being insufficiently favourable to buttsecks?
Why isn’t anyone else calling it? Fr. James Martin SJ is an obvious flaming queen. I’ve never seen any “public figure” whose behaviour, words and manner are more “camp”. I don’t have much in the way of “gaydar” but this guy is like a walking parody, a stock character from La Cage aux folles. I don’t understand why we’re all tiptoeing around this.
Why do we imagine that he is so very, very popular in the mainstream contemporary American Church as well as with the secularist mainstream media? Do we think it’s for his great faithfulness and zeal for souls? Really?
Whether he is currently actively engaging in sodomitical acts with another man is irrelevant. What he is certainly engaged in is a very public and aggressive campaign to have the Church endorse it – always wearing his collar of course, and always, always adding the Essjay – by lending the authority of his own ordination to his endorsement.
And is he creating scandal – in the traditional sense of leading others to believe a deadly error?
Judge for yourself.
As Connecticut Catholic Corner put it, he’s the Pied Piper of hell.
Fr. James Martin, this smarmy, smiling liar, is damning souls to hell.
He is damning precious souls, made by God for eternal happiness, to hell.
He is damning souls to hell.
CCC 2358: The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
Haven’t we had enough? Enough of this sodomite crap? I’ve certainly had enough of flaming queens lecturing the Catholic world, whilst they define themselves by their enthusiasm for the sin so grave that it “cries out to heaven” for God’s vengeance. Sick of people who are so warped and perverted by sin that Our Blessed Lord and Savior told St. Catherine of Siena that their twisted acts of sodomy make Him nauseous, and that even the demons withdraw from sodomites in flagrante because it is repellent to their angelic natures – demonic though it may be.
CCC 2358 says that we should avoid UNJUST discrimination against sodomites.
As in, hey, let’s not throw obvious, flaming queens like Fr. James Martin, Essjay off of the top of a 15 story building (like some people we know). Or, let’s not confine Fr. James Martin, Essjay, one of the most camped-up, lisping, exaggerated limp-wrists the Catholic world has ever openly tolerated, to house arrest (a punishment generally reserved in the modern Church for people like this).
We should hold him to public obscenity laws, which should be strengthened and enforced, but if same-sex lusting people like Fr. James Martin, Essjay, comport themselves in public in a sane, dignified manner befitting a Christian man, and not like a simpering, swishing, pinch-lipped little fairy, then there is no reason why any sort of forced sequestration should be necessary.
That would be UNJUST discrimination.
Now let’s talk about JUST discrimination.
Habitual sodomites, including persons who “just” have the inclination to sodomy, should be utterly, totally disqualified from the priesthood. Mathematics does not yet exist to describe the level of insanity needed to believe that people with massive psychosexual perversions which generally spring from narcissistic personality disorders SHOULD BE ALLOWED ANYWHERE NEAR THE PRIESTHOOD.
This is like turning over the neonatal intensive care unit at the local hospital to a pack of dingos. We JUSTLY discriminate against dingos running NICUs because dingos have no opposable thumbs, and also EAT BABIES.
Sodomites with narcissistic personality disorders are incapable of anything even remotely close to the quality of charity that is required of men called to espouse themselves to Christ and His Church, to be an Alter Christus both on the altar and in the confessional, and a spiritual father and virile protector of their flock. Sodomites are also vampiric, needing to prey on young people to generate more sodomitical sex partners. Hence the pedophile/ephebophile problem in the priesthood we see today.
[An article here in America Magazine by none other than Fr. James Martin SJ, telling us all how the John Jay Report’s findings that nearly all the vicitms of clerical sex abuse were teenaged boys, is in no way any kind of proof that sodomy-inclined priests like to prey on teenaged boys. HJMW]
If we had an ounce of sanity, we would discriminate against mincing, smirking vampiric cheerleaders for the buttsecks – always looking for “fresh meat” in the form of YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN – getting anywhere near the confessional – wherein they can literally kill a human soul in a matter of seconds with the lying words, “That’s not a sin…”, much less offering the Holy and August Sacrifice of the Mass.
And no, this isn’t Donatism. No one is suggesting that their sinful state in and of itself invalidates a Mass. It doesn’t. What we are talking about is whether or not flaming, raging, queens like Fr. James Martin, Essjay, SHOULD be offering the Holy Sacrifice and preaching heresy.
OF COURSE NOT!! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU??
ARE WE REALLY THAT FAR GONE, THAT COWED TO CULTURAL MARXISM THAT WE CAN’T EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THIS GLARINGLY OBVIOUS TRUTH?
Now these pitiable wretches, wallowing in the filthy sewage of their own vampiric perversity, dare, yes, DARE to lecture the world on “tolerance”, “love”, and “mercy” – which is nothing of the sort. When these perverts say “tolerance” they mean “relativism”. When they say “love” they mean “indifference”. And when they say “mercy,” they mean “permissiveness”. Because liars gonna lie, and perverts gonna perv.
Do I hate? Oh, hell yes I do. I hate effeminacy. I hate sodomy. I hate error. I hate lies. I hate evil.
What kind of depraved monster would I have to be NOT to hate these things?
Fr. James Martin, Essjay, prides himself on the fact that he EMBRACES all of these things, and excoriates others who do not. Sit in stillness with that depraved shit until you can smell its fetid, sulfuric stench.
Fr. James Martin should be utterly disregarded and disqualified to say WORD ONE about moral theology precisely because he is himself utterly steeped in and shackled by his own obvious psychosexual issues. For us to all sit here and stare intently at the crown moulding, or the dead bugs in the light fixture while this one-man gay pride parade marches up and down the promenade deck on the Barque of Peter is simply ridiculous. And sinful.
Enough of this. Enough of these sodomite clergy and prelates. Let their Reign of Terror end here.
“The first fruit of this synod [Sua Eminenza?] will be the idea that we have to be reaching out” – Wuerl
OCT 29, 2015 by HILARY WHITE
Cardinal Wuerl is back home in DC and is talking to the press:
Q: The final document achieved consensus but did not provide many specifics about how bishops and priests will be able to proceed in “accompanying” people. Do you expect the pope to answer those questions, to put some flesh on those bones in some concrete way?
A: I think the first fruit of this synod will be the idea that we have to be reaching out.
Now, more practically, what will the Holy Father do with this? He may share reflections on some of this material in his audience talks. He may decide to do some form of writing on this, or he may turn it over to some offices in the Roman Curia to say, ‘Bring back something on this.’
“The frame of reference now is no longer the Code of Canon Law. The frame of reference is now going to be, ‘What does the gospel really say here?’” …
So, the “frame of reference” is no longer Canon Law. And we have seen that it is no longer the traditional formulations of the Faith; it is no longer the Fathers or Doctors of the Church or the teaching of the ecumenical councils, the documents or definitions of previous popes or even, according to some cardinals, the plain words of Our Lord Jesus Christ as recorded in the Gospels.
So, how is this not simply the construction of an entirely new “church” based on modern (mostly sexual) proclivities?
Thanks Archbishop Lucas Van Looy: “The Synod is putting an end to the Church that judges people. We are not a church of judgement. We are a welcoming church, listening to the people and speaking in clear terms. Tenderness is the word of this Synod. This is the beginning of a new Church.”
Apparently, some have already got the message:
While many Catholic colleges and universities are using the occurrence of “NationalComing Out Day” to sponsor events promoting lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender andqueer (LGBTQ) identities and lifestyles throughout the month of October, such events
could actually be harmful to the students and risk betraying the Catholic faith,
according to information from the Catholic Medical Association and Courage International,
a Catholic apostolate that ministers to persons with same-sex attraction.
“Events like ‘Coming Out Day’ run the risk of equating a person’s identity with his or
her sexual attractions, which, although they form a significant part of a person’s experience, are only one factor in the whole complex reality of what it means to be a human being,” said Father Philip Bochanski, associate director of Courage International, in an interview with The Cardinal Newman Society.