Poppycock! (Mundabor on Annulment Fraud)

[ Again, so as to prevent sensitive souls from succumbing to the vapors, I won’t provide a direct link. But Mundabor’s site is readily “google-able” for Special Forces vets, Marines, combat pilots, homicide detectives and NYC cab drivers – the sort of folks who more likely won’t faint. Here’s today’s zinger. /gpmtrad ]

_______________________________________________________________

With usual rhetoric, yesterday’s “innovations” to the annulment process have been justified with the need to “help the poor”. This is first class poppycock. Let us see why.

1) Poor people have, to my knowledge, the money to marry. Even in poor Countries, the “poor” often expend What is – for their standards – a rather significant amount of money for ceremony, eating, and drinking. It does not seem that poverty is such an issue. “Oh, Mundabor, but it is a marriage! It is soooo important to the p… pp… ppp… oor!”

Well, exactly. It is important. It is a sacred bond, a solemn promise. Made in front of the entire community. Considered so important, that a correspondent amount of money is spent; because there is, and rightly so, money for what is important. Why, then, the celebration of this solemn promise should rightly cost, and the absolutely momentous, grave, equally as important decision that such a promise never validly took place should cost less, or next to nothing, or nothing at all? Hey, you have solemnly promised in front of the entire community, in front of Christ! How is now the reneging of this promise less important than the original promise?

2) Poor people have, or so the Vatican tells us, no money to pay for the expenses. But the others have. Why, then, not reduce the cost to the poor, rather than the cost of the procedure? When has the Church been shy in asking for money to provide for the spiritual needs of the poor? When have the “rich” been stingy in denying the poor the money for their spiritual needs?

No: if the problem really is poverty, the solution is to ask those who aren’t poor to contribute. I hear you say: “but in this case there would not be much in contributions, because people would understand that in very many cases what is wanted is merely a cheap and easy escape from a bond once freely chosen!”. Oh, I agree. I agree completely! That’s exactly the point! In this instance, helping Francis do what he wants would be seen as encouraging sinfulness and sabotaging the sacrament!

—–

No. The poor are not the issue. The godlessness of Francis and his entourage is. The forma mentis behind the papal Ukase is very simple: the marriage bond is a burden from which the spouse must be freed. This must be done in a way that circumvents the spirit of the annulment discipline without making the proceeds openly heretical.

The Church is the problem. Francis is the solution.

The Church is made to look bad. Francis is made to look good. The rest does not count. This is what this pontificate is all about.

I invite you to renew your prayers for the speedy end of this Pontificate and the return to sanity.

M

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2015/09/09/poppycock-mundabor-on-annulment-fraud/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

Leave a Reply