Nixon Goes To China?

Nixon goes to China:
“Pope Francis, you are the man to regularize the SSPX”
Update: National Catholic Register’s Intolerance

Or so thinks Patrick Archbold, writing for the National Catholic Register.*

His concluding paragraphs:

With the breakdown of discussion between the Holy See and the Society of St. Pius X at the end of the previous pontificate, the public mood during this first year of the current pontificate, and other internal events, traditional Catholics, both inside and outside the Church, have felt increasingly marginalized. Whether fair or true, I say without fear of contradiction that this is a prevailing sentiment.

This perception of marginalization has manifested itself in increasingly strident and frankly disrespectful rhetoric on the part of some traditionalists and their leaders.

I have great concern that without the all the generosity that faith allows by the leaders of the Church, that this separation, this wound on the Church, will become permanent. In fact, without such generosity, I fully expect it. Such permanent separation and feeling of marginalization will likely separate more souls than just those currently associated with the SSPX.

I have also come to believe that Pope Francis’ is exactly the right Pope to do it. In his address to the evangelicals, he makes clear his real concern for unity.

So here is what I am asking. I ask the Pope to apply that wide generosity to the SSPX and to normalize relations and their standing within the Church. I am asking the Pope to do this even without the total agreement on the Second Vatican Council. Whatever their disagreements, surely this can be worked out over time with the SSPX firmly implanted in the Church. I think that the Church needs to be more generous toward unity than to insist upon dogmatic adherence to the interpretation of a non-dogmatic council. The issues are real, but they must be worked out with our brothers at home and not with a locked door.

Further, Pope Francis’ commitment to the aims of the Second Vatican Council is unquestioned. Were he to be generous in such a way, nobody would ever interpret it to be a rejection of the Council. How could it be? This perception may not have been the case in the last pontificate. Pope Francis is uniquely suited to this magnanimous moment.

I believe this generosity is warranted and standard practice in the Church. We do not insist on religious orders that may have strayed even further in the other direction sign a copy of Pascendi Dominici Gregis before they can be called Catholic again. So please let us not insist on the corollary for the SSPX. Must we insist on more for a group that doctrinally would not have raised an eyebrow a mere fifty years ago? I pray not.

Give them canonical status and organizational structure that will protect them. Bring them home, for their sake and the sake of countless other souls. I truly believe that such generosity will be repaid seven-fold. Pope Benedict has done so much of the heavy lifting already, all that is required is just a little more.

Please Holy Father, let us not let this moment pass and this rift grow into a chasm. Make this generous offer and save the Church from further division. Do this so that none of your successors will ever say, “If only we had done more.”

In our Quinquagesima Editorials, repeated more than once (Ecce Ascendimus Ierosolymam, 2006 and other years), we insisted that “this is the time” — and by “the time” we meant not a specific moment, but, generally, the pontificate of Benedict XVI. We have always believed that, though negotiations are important to smooth details, only a generous and kind unilateral settlement by the Supreme Legislator could get things done — that was the only way Summorum Pontificum was promulgated as well; if Pope Ratzinger had tried to negotiate with French and German Bishops, we would still be waiting for it… Well, Mr. Archbold is very optimistic in suggesting what is an unexpected outcome for the moment. Let us pray for the unity of the Church, and for peace inside the Fraternity of priests founded by Abp. Lefebvre.

Charity and the path up to Jerusalem and Calvary (cf. Epistle and Gospel for next Sunday, Quinquagesima): those are the only paths to salvation, peace, holiness, and unity, in the Church and in life everlasting.

___________________
*Update (0130 GMT): In an amazingly intolerant attitude, EWTN’s National Catholic Register removed the post above minutes after it was posted by Patrick Archbold. This reminds us of the pure words of Benedict XVI exactly on this same affair, in a letter fully written by the Pope Emeritus personally:

Certainly, for some time now, and once again on this specific occasion, we have heard from some representatives of that community many unpleasant things – arrogance and presumptuousness, an obsession with one-sided positions, etc. Yet to tell the truth, I must add that I have also received a number of touching testimonials of gratitude which clearly showed an openness of heart. But should not the great Church also allow herself to be generous in the knowledge of her great breadth, in the knowledge of the promise made to her? Should not we, as good educators, also be capable of overlooking various faults and making every effort to open up broader vistas? And should we not admit that some unpleasant things have also emerged in Church circles? At times one gets the impression that our society needs to have at least one group to which no tolerance may be shown; which one can easily attack and hate. And should someone dare to approach them – in this case the Pope – he too loses any right to tolerance; he too can be treated hatefully, without misgiving or restraint.

In this case, not the Pope Emeritus, but poor Pat Archbold. EWTN’s National Catholic Register and their intolerance just proved Benedict XVI right – one more time! It cannot be that Pentecostals have full presence in their paper, and their own Catholic brothers and sisters (whose priests are in an irregular situation, but are still priests, celebrating Catholic sacraments every single day) do not. How can unity ever be achieved thus? Curiously enough, we are pretty confident that Francis would be the first to reject this demeaning level of servility and sycophancy.

*Second Update (0230 GMT): Mr. Archbold’s article can now be found in his own personal website, here.

[Image source]
Labels: Censorship of Conservative Catholics, SSPX under Pope Francis
Posted by New Catholic at 2/26/2014 12:57:00 AM

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
http://angelqueen.org/2014/02/26/nixon-goes-to-china/
Get AQ Email Updates
AQ RSS Feed

15 comments on “Nixon Goes To China?

  1. Why not? Nixon and Mao, Gorby and the Gipper… Why not Fellay and Francesco? Why the heck not?

    Of course, I’m not holding my breath, but… why not?

  2. Wow, if a devout modernist like Jorge could bring the SSPX into “full communion” without strings attached that, my friends, would be truly a miracle!! I’m not going to bet the farm on it, but sometimes God works in mysterious ways.

  3. andrew65 on said:

    Wishful thinking. Would it be a reconciliation on the terms of the FFI?

  4. How will contradictory positions regarding the Faith be dealt with if they are “regularized”? This isn’t something you can agree to disagree about.

  5. As wonderful as it would be if the FSSPX were “regularized” with no strings attached. It would be just as great to see how the leftist, secularist, anti-traditional Catholic and pro simple Jorge main stream media would handle that?! I suppose they would still bash the FSSPX, and traditional Catholicism overall, yet spin it to make Jorge look like a compassionate and humble shepherd. I don’t think it will happen, but I hope it does.

  6. In what ways would they be united? How are they defining things such as religious liberty in this situation if it were to happen?
    If the SSPX is going around trying to convert people stating that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation while the modernists are saying just to the best you can in whatever religion you’re in and you will get to heaven that’s going to confuse people.

    How will Catholicism be defined? If the past few decades are any indication, Rome wants to neutralize traditional movements such as Campos and now the Franciscan Friars after okaying them.

  7. God works in mysterious ways; ’tis true, but I have my doubts that Jorge has any sympathy for the traditional Catholics that are served by the FSSPX or any other traditional group. However, Our Lord has performed many miracles before and the book on Eucharistic Miracles comes immediately to mind. He could, if He wished, perform similar miracles at every TLM whilst doing the opposite at novus ordo celebrations. What would Jorge and the Modernist clergy do then? In other words Our Lord could set things right in a heartbeat but the words of Scripture must be fulfilled and we are seeing that happen before our very eyes.

  8. Why in the world would one want unity with these lying heretics? I say NO! When have we gotten so desperate to say oh yes a bad apple in the barrel of good doesn’t spoil the rest? Or, worse yet! Toss a good apple in a barrel of bad and it will change them all to good? Logic and the history of humanity shows a different outcome. Yes, With God there is no impossibilities, but even He doesn’t violate His own natural laws. The Great Flood shows God’s solution and wrath. He promised not to flood the world again, but this time it will be Fire! Far better to stand alone against the horde of blasphemers and heretics than to join them. It was the error of Vatican II to think man alone could unify the “christian” religions. When actually the Roman Catholic Church is/was the Only Christian Religion. The SSPX is the Castle Keep the last hold out who hasn’t bargained with the devil. If it falls then truely the Faith will need to flee to the wilderness.

Leave a Reply