Catholics reject bishops’ push for immigration increase

The Catholic Church’s hierarchy is using Sunday sermons to push for passage of a major rewrite of the nation’s immigration laws, but the Catholic flock believes the Congress has a greater moral responsibility to aid Americans than to aid illegal immigrants.

Only 14 percent of 4,967 Catholic likely voters in 26 states said Congress has “a lot” of responsibility “to help protect the ability of current illegal immigrants to hold a job and support their families without fear of deportation,” according to data from polls funded by NumbersUSA.

In contrast, 54 percent of Catholics said the government has very little or no responsibility to help illegals get jobs and avoid deportation.

The remaining 27 percent says the government has some responsibility.

NumbersUSA is an immigration reform group that wants to reduce the current immigration flow of 1 million people per year.

The polls were conducted by Pulse Opinion Research prior to the Senate’s approval in July of a rewrite bill. Respondents were asked for their religious views, allowing NumbersUSA to highlight the low support among Catholics for the hierarchy’s push for a staged amnesty.

The polling data should help offset the pro-amnesty lobbying by other religious groups, including the Catholic hierarchy, Roy Beck, direct of NumbersUSA, told The Daily Caller.

“Members of Congress who are concerned about how they’ll be judged on a basis of morality need to know that as far as Catholics go, there are a few dozen bishops that take on the [pro-immigration] position, but the vast majority of Catholics place a higher priority on American workers,” said Beck.

The polling data also shows that the Catholic voters believe government has a moral duty to aid Americans, he said.

Forty-eight percent of the respondents said Congress has “a lot” of “moral responsibility … to help protect unemployed or low-wage Americans from having to compete with foreign workers for U.S. jobs.”

Only 19 percent said Congress has no or very little responsibility to shield disadvantaged Americans from foreign workers. Thirty-one percent said Congress has “some” responsibility.

Only 28 percent of Catholic support the hierarchy’s effort to win “legal status and work permits” for illegals. Thirty-two percent favored deportation, and 30 percent said some could stay, but not be given work permits.

The views of Catholics are important because non-Hispanic Catholics have been an influential swing vote that has often sided with Democrats on economic issues, but which are now trending Republican. For example, GOP candidate Mitt Romney won 59 percent of the white Catholic vote in 2012.

If Catholics were to see the GOP as dominated by business interests, they’d be more likely to swing back to the Democratic candidates.

The Senate bill passed in July. If approved by the House, it would provide a staged legislation to 11 million illegal immigrants, double the number of guest workers in the country, and double the inflow of immigrants to 46 million by 2033. The increased immigration would would ensure the arrival of one new immigrant for every two American births.

The House GOP’s leadership says it wants to pass a major immigration rewrite this fall. However, the leadership has yet to schedule a floor debate in the House.

The Catholic hierarchy supports an immigration bill, partly because a growing slice of Catholic Americans are Hispanics who know or live with some of the 11 million illegal immigrants inside the country. The church also supports a bill because its religious views compel it to downgrade the importance of national borders.

However, it is not clear if many Catholic priests will spread the message in September sermons.

The push is being directed by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, whose staff tend to fund and support progressive causes, except on sexual matters.

“We cannot let this opportunity pass,” New York’s archbishop, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, wrote in an article for the New York Daily News. “Immigration reform would help families, it would help our economy and it would improve our security.”

Business groups are strongly backing the immigration bill because it reduces labor costs and increases the number of people able to buy basic products, such as food, cars, apartments and TVs. The Senate bill would also shift more of the nation’s annual income from wage earners to investors, according to a July report by the Congressional Budget Office.

Democrats support the plan to double immigration because the data shows that most immigrants and their children identify with the Democratic Party’s offers of government aid and social inclusion to groups on the periphery of American society.

Polls shows most Americans strongly oppose the increased inflow of foreign workers scheduled by the Senate bill. That concern is boosted by the stalled economy which now offers only job for every three job seekers.

The NumbersUSA polls show that only 22 percent of Catholics somewhat or strongly agreed with industry’s claim that the “United States is faced with labor shortages and needs more immigrant workers.”

However, many Americans are willing to back a conditional amnesty of illegal immigrants, but only if the government follows through on promises to end further illegal immigration.

Also, immigration is a very low priority for Americans. A recent report by Gallup showed that only three percent of Americans believe it is a top problem.


Read more:

Read more:

Get AQ Email Updates

2 comments on “Catholics reject bishops’ push for immigration increase

  1. A close reading of John Rao on the Americanist heresy will broaden perspectives on how that noxious weed has been brewed, sipped from porcelain cups and exhaled by the American episcopate since the Revolutionary War.

    That, during the past century, a class of men selected as much for their political savvy and showmanship as their accounting acumen, the USCCCP has morphed from a “good works” doctrine into full-blown socialists is really not all that surprising.

    Just look whose living in the Motel 6 in sunny Nova Roma, these days.

    There have been pitifully few effective American bishops since long before and ever since the Council to Turn the World Upside Down, 1962-5. Effective spiritually, that is.

    Were it otherwise, it’s just possible that the Council would have been shut down, perhaps before it ever saw the light of day. The American church’s financial and international political clout COULD have helped prevent the disaster. Sadly, the Amerikanskies showed up dumb as stumps (there was not one real theologian among them) and went along to get along.

    They ignored the clear warnings Monsgr. Fenton and Frs. Hanahoe and Greenstock made very plain in American Ecclesiastical Review. They wrote about the dire consequences of the nouvelle theologie and modernist trends that would likely be encountered at the council.

    Even sunny Nova Roma has to still listen to the Amerikanskies. The are the single largest financial resource the Church has.

    Talk about missed opportunities!

  2. What, exactly, is the difference between the “American heresy” position on illegal immigration and the one held by the old “Bishop of Rome?” I guess we’re all Americans now.

Leave a Reply