Originally from ANTIMODERNISME.INFO
Translated into English from the Spanish version (beware; some inaccuracies could be found)
Monday, 29th October, 2012
RESPONSE TO FATHER SCHMIDBERGER – FROM A PRIEST OF THE DISTRICT OF FRANCE.
Father Schmidberger has great merit: He has never hidden his desire to see the Society of St. Pius X put into the hands of Benedict XVI “for the greater good of the Church! His statement regarding the expulsion of the “obstacle” Williamson is nothing surprising.
In a statement to friends and benefactors of October 26, 2012, you claim that the expulsion of Bishop Williamson is “the result of an evolution that has lasted for some years.” It would be the product of a “dislike” for the general council that has been transformed into an “open rebellion”.
Father, you are dishonest! On February 13, 2012, a journalist of “Die Welt” that asked “The Pope said he would not have approved the lifting of the excommunication of the four bishops, if he had been advised of the statements of Bishop Williamson . What will come from Williamson after an eventual reintegration of the Society? “You replied:” I am no prophet, but in a context as important as the establishment of a canonical structure for our fraternity, I think that the talks would probably prolong in some sessions and that there would be talks about Bishop Williamson. In addition, we must also expect him to respect the decisions of the superior general. ”
You are not a prophet but you are very well placed to know what Bishop Fellay and you want. You want an agreement with Rome and for that you are ready to meet the demands of international Zionism and the Conciliar Church that is subject to it. In the same interview, you said: “We give up the relative freedom that we have so far resorted to for the international spread of our work, and we put it in the hands of the pope.” While Archbishop Lefebvre asked our bishops to “deposit the grace of his episcopacy “in” a perfectly Catholic successor of Peter “(Mgr Lefebvre, August 29, 1987).
Benedict XVI is the “Successor of Peter perfectly Catholic”? The one that is also the head of the “liberal modernist Rome, which continues its destructive work of the Kingdom of Our Lord as he proved in Assisi (III), confirming the liberal thesis of Vatican II on religious freedom”? (Mgr Lefebvre, letter of August 29, 1987)
As Williamson hindered your wicked plans and the disastrous Zionist propaganda, you, and Bishop Fellay, thought they had to finish him: Either Williamson accepts to be buried alive or he will be expelled under disciplinary pretexts.
You also cite a private statement of Bp. Williamson that was not meant to be made public, in which the dean of the Bishops talked about “getting rid of Bishop Fellay” and “his band”. As you refer to when Monsignor Lefebvre asked the future bishops to “remain united under the leadership of the Superior General.” But in your blindness or dishonesty, you fail to quote the whole passage to better slander Williamson accusing him of having insulted the Superior. This is the passage in question:
“Well, I conjure you to remain deeply attached to the Society of St. Pius X, to be deeply united with one another, under their Superior General, in the Catholic Faith always remembering this word of Paul to the Galatians (c . I, vers. 8 and 9): “Even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than what we preach, let him be anathema. As we told you, we say it again: If anyone preach to you a gospel contrary to the one you have received, let him be anathema” (Mgr Lefebvre, letter of August 29, 1987)
Submission to the Superior General is “in the Catholic Faith of ever” As you and Bishop Fellay want to put ourselves under the authority of a pope who sins against faith seriously, then “anathema sit”! What can be translated as: let us part, or “let’s get rid of Bishop Fellay and his band.” There is nothing offensive in that.
Despite numerous advices, friendly exhortations and warnings, Bishop Fellay and his band did not want to change their suicidal behavior. Bp. Williamson had to speak.
Father, you are so dishonest that in this year 2012, you wrote to the three bishops, encouraged by Bishop Fellay, a letter in which you justify in twelve points the “reasons” to conclude an agreement with those people with whom we are in disagreement. The answers you received, all three in their own way, fully destroyed the bottom of your agreement pseudo-rationale. Publish them so your stubbornness is shown in the face of the district of Germany.
If Bishop Williamson is not the only one to oppose your dangerous projects, he is the only one that courageously targets the brain behind these projects. Bishop Tissier de Mallerais and Bishop de Galarreta have been content to contradict and refute Menzingen’s erroneous policy and doctrines, but without naming those responsible for this internal revolution. That’s fine but it is insufficient. The proof? The recent interview of Father Pfluger making a profession of “angelic” faith in terms of “the Holy Spirit’s assistance to the pope and the bishops,” they, for whom the greatest tragedy in the history of the Church, namely, the Vatican II, after having been a new Pentecost, has become the compass for the XXI century Church!
Therefore Bp. Williamson was the only true and real obstacle to your manipulations so that he was the Anti-Notra aetate par excellence.
Bp. Williamson will continue talking. Bishop Tissier de Mallerais will do it when he considers it appropriate, and Bishop de Galarreta will do it again when he has returned from his illusions. The latter, hopes to save the essentials through the first, imperfect and fragile condition sine qua non of the chapter. He believes that this will prevent Menzingen’s rotten head to finalize a bad deal with Benedict XVI. He does not want yet to resign to see that the unity of the Fraternity of Monsignor Lefebvre no longer exists. There are two irreconcilable camps in it, as in the Council: a minority liberal, sentimental and conciliatory, before being conciliar, and other minority that is Catholic doctrinal and uncompromising. The bulk of the troops, being too busy to realize what is at stake, prefers to submit to authority. Because today, the ruling head of the Brotherhood is more like Paul VI full of contradictions than Saint Pius X bright and strong in the combat for the faith.
Father, you have been dishonest. Stop deceiving the priests and the faithful. Realize your error, return to the healthy policy of our founder and stop destroying the family home.
A priest of the district, on 28 October 2012.
On the Feast of Christ the King.