Catholic Law Prof Defends Obama’s Abortion Record
A law professor at Duquesne University took to the pages of the National Catholic Reporter to convince readers that Obama is more “pro-life” than Romney.
Nicholas Cafardi writes:
Obama favors, and included in the Affordable Care Act, $250 million of support for vulnerable pregnant women and alternatives to abortion. This support will make abortions much less likely, since most abortions are economic. Romney, on the other hand, has endorsed Wisconsin Republican Paul Ryan’s budget, which will cut hundreds of millions of dollars out of the federal plans that support poor women. The undoubted effect: The number of abortions in the United States will increase. On these facts, Obama is much more pro-life than Romney.
But let’s not stop there. Obama does not financially profit from the abortion industry. Romney does. Bain Capital, in the time Romney was listed as its legal head and even when he was attending Bain board meetings, was an owner of Stericycle, a major disposer of the dead bodies of aborted children in the United States. Bain owned a share of Stericycle until 2004, selling its interest for a profit in the tens of millions of dollars. We can parse what Romney’s 1999 “retroactive retirement” from Bain means, but he still gets an annual payout from the firm. To the extent those dollars are part of Bain’s Stericycle profits, a strong argument exists that Romney is an abortion profiteer. How pro-life is that?
And it has long been known that millions of Bain Capital’s original outside funding, solicited by Romney himself, came from wealthy El Salvadorian clans, some of whom, while they were funding Bain, were “linked to right wing death squads.” Death squads killed tens of thousands of mostly poor people in El Salvador. They also killed priests, nuns and Archbishop Oscar Romero. How pro-life is that? How pro-life is taking the money of these people and doubling or tripling it for them? And did any of their Bain profits fund more death squads? Before we endorse Romney’s “pro-life” claims, isn’t it important for us to know that?
So speaking as a temporary, part-time member of the parallel magisterium, I think that if anyone should be disinvited from the Al Smith Dinner, it is Mitt Romney. Based on the above record, he, and not Obama, is the anti-life, “pro-abortion” candidate.
Cafardi’s arguments clearly don’t take into account many facts including that while Obama may not personally profit from the abortion industry, his campaign has certainly accepts their help. In fact, just today Planned Parenthood’s advocacy arm announced that it’s launching an 11-state bus tour to rally female voters around President Obama starting next week. Planned Parenthood also launched a $1.4 million ad buy blasting Romney earlier this year.
And while Cafardi says that Obamacare doesn’t cover abortions, that might come as a surprise to the House of Representatives that passed a bill explicitly saying that it “expands the role of the Federal Government in funding and facilitating abortion and plans that cover abortion.”
And Bain reportedly negotiated the Stericyle investment deal in November 1999, nine months after Romney said he left.