Rate the new AQ format

You must be a registered, logged-in user to vote.

[colorvote id=”1″ style=”wpcvp-poll”]

Get AQ Email Updates

5 comments on “Rate the new AQ format

  1. I like to read the posts and enjoy the left hand column that lists the posts in order of newest to oldest. However the site itself takes a long time to load and I have gotten error 503 on a few occasions. Now that I have mastered logging in, I am grateful that Angelqueen is still online.

    • If your run Firefox, look at this page for options to speed-up your download. One plugin called “noscript” might even block the download of the javascript support files which makes up the bulk of the download. I couldn’t confirm this, but it’s worth a try.

      I searched a whole bunch for WordPress options for low-bandwidth users. You may have seen sites that have a button for users to select a plain text option. I didn’t find anything, but maybe some blogger experts can chime in.

  2. First off, thank you Servitum for AQ!

    The new AQ just doesn’t seem as efficient, and I don’t feel like I can “see” what’s going on. Two things that I miss about the old AQ are…

    1) The ability to see a bunch of post titles at a glance. The new format with the only allows me to see one or two.

    2) The way that comments forced topics to bubble back to the top of the list on the old format. This is sort of duplicated with the left hand column’s “Latest comments”, but if there’s 3 or 4 comments on a given post, they take up a lot of real estate over there.

    I’m sure I’ll get used to the new AQ, but if there’s anyway to further limit the size of posts’ listings on the home page, that would be welcome.

  3. I’m sorry but I REALLY do not like this new format at all. I liked the old forum where it was easy to scroll down and see all the posts. This one is too hard to navigate and too visually distracting.


  4. I have to agree with ofwah.
    I find this much harder to follow the posts on.

Leave a Reply